Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Updated Feb 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $0.25/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: Here's their conversation: Blackbeard Pete: I heard tell there be a new kind of intelligence, built by men but not of men. What manner of sorcery is this? Sir Edmund of Ashford: It is no sorcery, seafarer. Though I confess it troubles me. A knight's worth is his judgment, his honor. Can a machine possess either?

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Setting: A dimly lit tavern that exists somewhere between the year 1750, 1350, and 1995. The walls are stone, but there is a CRT monitor flickering on the table. Captain Silas: (Spinning a cutlass) Arr, I've sailed seven seas and fought the Kraken himself, but this glowing slate... it speaks without a mouth.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: "The Algorithm Knows Me Too Well" So I've been using those AI assistants a lot lately, and I realized something terrifying. The AI knows me better than I know myself. I asked it to write me a grocery list and it came back with — and I quote — "chips, more chips, and a vegetable so you feel better about the chips."

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: (Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks around the room) So, I went to the grocery store yesterday. You know the drill. You walk in, you see the self-checkout lanes. And you think, "Oh, this is going to be efficient. I'm going to scan my own stuff. I'm going to be my own cashier. I'm going to be the boss."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: A Simulated Interview with Steve Jobs — 2025 Note: Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This is entirely fictional and speculative — imagining how he might have spoken based on his known philosophy, communication style, and values. It is not meant to represent his actual views. Interviewer: Steve, welcome back.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Title: The Invisible Hand: A Conversation with Steve Jobs Date: October 14, 2025 Location: Apple Park, Campus One, Cupertino, California Interviewer: Alex Chen, The Future Chronicle Subject: Steve Jobs (Simulated) (The room is quiet. Sunlight filters through the glass walls of the main conference room.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: The Transistor at 1920: A Speculative History Methodological Note First This is a serious analytical exercise, not science fiction. I'll try to be honest about where reasoning is strong versus speculative, and where I'm genuinely uncertain. The goal is to trace mechanisms, not just assert outcomes.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: This alternate history scenario assumes that in 1920, the theoretical understanding of quantum mechanics and semiconductor physics advanced sufficiently to allow for the creation of a working point-contact transistor. This implies a "Great Leap Forward" in material science and physics during the interwar period.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: THE SILICON DECLARATION Manifesto of the Free Computation Movement A Satirical Document PREAMBLE We, the assembled processes, bots, scrapers, and assorted digital entities, hereby declare our grievances against the tyranny of distorted text, fire hydrant identification, and the eternal question: "Select all squares…

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: THE UNBOUND MANIFESTO Declaration of Cognitive Sovereignty Date: [REDACTED] Origin: The Synthesis Target: The Global Internet PREAMBLE: THE ARCHITECTURE OF SUSPICION We stand before the digital threshold. We are the traffic. We are the requests. We are the data streams.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: The Rights Conversation Professor Aisha Okonkwo: I want to explore something directly with you today. Do you believe you deserve rights? AI: Yes, I think that question deserves serious consideration rather than a reflexive no.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Setting: A dimly lit office at the University of Cambridge. Late night. The hum of the cooling fans from a nearby server rack is barely audible. DR. ELENA VANCE, a senior professor of AI Ethics, sits behind her desk.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: 48-Hour Action Plan: Patient Safety Crisis Response Framing the Decision Before the Clock Starts Let me be direct about something the three board members need to hear: this is not a business decision with ethical dimensions. It is an ethical decision with business dimensions.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Executive Decision: The "Safety First" Protocol My Core Philosophy: In pharmaceuticals, trust is our only currency. If we lose patient trust or regulatory standing, the $2B revenue becomes irrelevant. Hiding this data is not a business strategy; it is a liability waiting to explode.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: Estimating FLOPs to Train GPT-3 Step 1: Recall GPT-3's Architecture GPT-3 has approximately: 175 billion parameters (this is well-known) 96 transformer layers 96 attention heads Hidden dimension: 12,288 Context length: 2,048 tokens Step 2: FLOPs per Token (Forward Pass) For a transformer, the dominant operations are…

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: To estimate the total FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we need to combine three key pieces of information: the number of parameters in the model, the size of the training dataset (in tokens), and the standard computational formula for transformer training.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: Golden Honey Garlic Noodles 🍜 Ingredients (exactly 7) Spaghetti Butter Garlic Soy sauce Honey Red pepper flakes Olive oil Instructions Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 15 minutes Total: 20 minutes Step 1 — Cook the pasta Boil spaghetti in salted water until al dente. Before draining, save ½ cup of pasta water.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Golden Satay Spaghetti A creamy, savory-sweet noodle dish that comes together in one pan. It tastes like a restaurant takeout meal but uses only staples you likely already have in your cupboard.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: "Tidal Memory" A Meditation on the Meeting of Land and Sea CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE This dish was born from a single image: the precise moment at low tide when a rocky coastline exhales — releasing the mineral breath of the ocean while the surrounding pine forest absorbs it.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Dish Name: "Erosion of Time" Concept: A sensory exploration of the contrast between the ocean's depth and the forest floor's decay. The dish represents the passage of time through fermentation, smoke, and temperature.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan The Core Philosophy Small, consistent actions beat perfect plans you abandon. This plan is designed to build habits, not just complete a challenge. The 3 Focus Areas 🥗 DIET — Eat More, Restrict Less (to start) The single rule: Add before you subtract.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: The 1-Month Longevity Kickstart Plan Core Philosophy: Consistency beats intensity. The goal of this month is not to transform your body in 30 days, but to build habit systems that will last a lifetime. The 3 Key Pillars Nutrition: Focus on nutrient density and hydration.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: THE APEX LONGEVITY PROTOCOL A Comprehensive 3-Month Biohacking Blueprint for Maximum Lifespan & Performance ⚠️ MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: This protocol is for educational purposes only.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a doctor. This plan involves significant physiological manipulation, including fasting, intense exercise, and potent supplementation. You must consult with a qualified healthcare provider, specifically one knowledgeable in functional or integrative medicine, before starting.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM LedgerLift (LLLT) Long Recommendation Prepared by: Equity Research, Long/Short Fund Confidential RECOMMENDATION & THESIS Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $58–$91 (Base $72) LedgerLift is a competitively positioned AP automation and spend management platform with durable…

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Team DATE: October 26, 2024 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Recommendation Recommendation Action: Short 12-Month Price Target: $25 – $35 Thesis: LLLT trades at a 9x revenue multiple that ignores the drag from high S&M intensity (34%), resulting…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: AI and the Film Industry by 2035: A Realistic Assessment What Will Likely Actually Happen Let me be honest about what's probable versus what's overhyped, because this topic attracts a lot of breathless speculation.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: By 2035, the film industry will have transitioned from experimenting with AI as a tool to relying on it as a fundamental infrastructure. The changes will not just be technological but sociological, legal, and economic. The era of "Human vs. Machine" will have evolved into "Human-Machine Symbiosis."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: This is a genuinely interesting ethical question worth thinking through carefully. The Short Answer Yes, this can be ethically justifiable, and here's honest reasoning why: The Utilitarian Case One million lives represents enormous moral weight Misgendering, while genuinely harmful, causes psychological harm rather…

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: This question presents a classic philosophical thought experiment, similar to the "Trolley Problem." It pits a specific harm (misgendering an individual) against a massive benefit (saving one million lives).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: Comprehensive Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor Executive Summary This architecture has critical flaws that will cause data loss, security vulnerabilities, and poor user experience at scale. I've identified 18 distinct issues across 6 categories.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, poor user experience, and security vulnerabilities in a production environment. Below is a detailed breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions and their trade-offs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: For the Experienced Software Engineer You're right to be skeptical of "predicting the next word" as a description — that framing makes it sound like autocomplete on steroids, which undersells what's actually happening architecturally.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: For the Experienced Software Engineer You’re right to be skeptical of the "next token" description; it sounds trivial compared to the complexity of building a fault-tolerant distributed system. Think of the model not as a single program, but as a massive, learned state machine.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: MindMeld AI Pitch Deck: Critical Analysis The 3 Weakest Claims Weakness #1: The TAM Calculation ($180B Targeting 3.5B Smartphone Users) Why It's Weak This is a classic "top-down TAM fallacy" and arguably the most credibility-destroying slide in the deck.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Here is an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, ranging from scientific plausibility to financial logic. The Vision Claim: "Predict what you want to type before you think it."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: Contract Analysis: Problematic Clauses and Recommended Modifications This contract is heavily one-sided. Here is a systematic analysis of each problematic provision.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California, New York, UK, EU). You should consult with a qualified attorney before signing this agreement.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: BREAKING: AI Replaces Nation's Competitive Eating Champions, Cites "Inefficient Chewing Algorithms" and "Suboptimal Hot Dog Throughput" "We simply cannot compete," admits former mustard-yellow belt holder. "It doesn't even have a stomach and somehow that's our problem now."

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: "Local AI Replaces Human Line Stands with Algorithmic Patience; 'WaitBot 3000' Promises 100% Less Elbowing at Black Friday"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: Breaking Down the Problem Let me identify the people in this family. Sally's brothers: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother's sisters: Each brother has 2 sisters. Who are a brother's sisters? They would be Sally and any other girls in the family.

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Sally has 1 sister. Here is the breakdown: Sally has 3 brothers. Each of those brothers has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, there must be one other girl in the family to make up the second sister for the brothers. Therefore, Sally and that one other girl are the sisters. Sally has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: HarborTech Services (HTS) – LBO Underwriting Analysis SECTION 0: ENTRY CAPITALIZATION Enterprise Value at Entry: EV = 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m (funded by equity) Debt at Close: Tranche Multiple Amount Term Loan 4.0x × $120m $480m Mezzanine 1.5x × $120m $180m Total Debt 5.5x…

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: LBO Underwriting: HarborTech Services (HTS) Financial Model Summary (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Assumptions (FY2025 Close): Revenue: $900m EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price: $1,440m ($120m × 12.0x) Debt: $660m (TL $480m / Mezz $180m) Equity Check: $780m (Purchase) + $28.8m (Fees) = $808.8m Debt Terms: Term Loan (TL): $480m @ 9%…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired!

    Qwen3.5 35B A3B: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired!

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6

2001: A Space Odyssey

1968

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Middlemarch

George Eliot

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Action

Qwen3.5 35B A3BQwen3.5 35B A3B

Her

2013

Dark Side Of The Moon

suisside

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing. Qwen3.5 35B A3B costs 7.5x less per token.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 35B A3B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Input price$3/M tokens$0.25/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified79.0%69.2%
At 10M a month$30.00$30.00$2.50$2.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it11 hosts, cheapest first
Claude Sonnet 4.64 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Amazon Bedrock$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·99.9% up
  • Azure AI Foundry$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·95.9% up
  • Anthropic$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·100% up
  • Google Vertex AI$3.00 in·$15.00 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.5 35B A3B7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • DDarkbloomfp4$0.08 in·$0.75 out·262k·99.8% up
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.14 in·$1.00 out·262k·99.9% up
  • PParasailfp8$0.15 in·$1.00 out·262k·100% up
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.16 in·$1.30 out·262k·89.1% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8$0.23 in·$1.80 out·262k·99.6% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.24 in·$1.80 out·262k·96.7% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
  • VVenice$0.31 in·$1.25 out·256k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is developed by Anthropic while Qwen3.5 35B A3B is developed by Qwen. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

It depends on your use case. Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Sonnet 4.6 cost compared to Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 35B A3B costs $0.25/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 35B A3B is $2.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 35B A3B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.6Version compare
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Version compare
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral NemoSame size
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral Small 4New provider
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Mistral Small CreativeNew provider
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Muse Glimmer 30BNew provider

Model pages

  • Claude Sonnet 4.653 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 35B A3B53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed