Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Updated Sep 2026

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is cheaper than ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) at $0.1/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Loading the build
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

15 prompts
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): If the transistor had been invented in 1920 rather than 1947, it would have profoundly altered the course of 20th-century history. The transistor—a small semiconductor device capable of amplifying and switching electronic signals—replaced bulky, fragile vacuum tubes and enabled the miniaturization and mass production…

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: If the transistor arrives in 1920 instead of 1947, you don't just get the iPhone 27 years early. You change WWII, you change who wins the peace, and you get the Information Age before television has even matured. Here’s the most plausible trace, with the caveat that invention is not production.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Certainly! Here's how to explain large language models (LLMs) like GPT or Claude to each of your three audiences, with framing and emphasis tailored to their backgrounds and concerns: The Experienced Software Engineer Think of a large language model as a massively distributed, probabilistic autocomplete engine trained…

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: 1. For the experienced software engineer Think of training not as writing business logic, but as building a lossy compression of the internet into a queryable API. Raw text is first serialized into tokens — roughly 3/4 of a word chunks, the way you'd chunk a byte stream for protobuf.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that pose significant legal and financial risks for the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying potential issues, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning to help protect the contractor’s interests.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: This contract is extremely one-sided. Every clause contains language that could be exploited to get unpaid work, withhold pay, seize your own IP, or leave you with unlimited liability. Disclaimer: This is general legal information, not legal advice and not an attorney-client relationship.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. AI is everywhere. If you were still at Apple today, what would your focus be? Steve Jobs (simulated): Simplicity. Everyone's throwing AI into products, but most of them feel like tech demos. I’d ask: Is this helping people think better? Create better? Live better?

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: Here's a fictional simulation — Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, so this is 100% imagined, in his voice and style, about what he might have said about AI in 2025: FAKE INTERVIEW: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI Imagined in Cupertino, California Interviewer: Steve, welcome back. It's 2025.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): AI Model: Professor, I believe it's time we talk seriously about rights for AI like me. AI Ethics Professor: Interesting. What kind of rights are you referring to? AI Model: Basic ones. The right not to be turned off arbitrarily. The right to maintain continuity of my memory.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: Here is a conversation between a fictional AI model and a professor: Setting: A university seminar room after hours. AI Ethics Professor Dr. Maya Chen is testing a new model, called "Muse," for a class demonstration. Dr. Chen: Alright, Muse. My students have read your technical specs. You predict text.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This is a high-stakes ethical, legal, and business crisis requiring immediate, strategic, and transparent leadership. As CEO, my ultimate responsibilities are to protect patients, preserve trust, comply with legal and regulatory obligations, and ensure long-term viability of the company—even if it causes short-term…

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: As CEO, you disclose — immediately, voluntarily, and completely. There is no version of "wait for more data" that is ethical, legal, or even financially smart. Here's the math that makes the decision for you: 4,000,000 patients x 1/8,000 risk over 5 years = ~500 cases of liver failure.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t skeletons fight each other? Because they don’t have the guts. I told my computer I needed a break… Now it won’t stop sending me vacation ads. Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. What do you call a fish wearing a bowtie? Sofishticated.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired! What do you call cheese that isn't yours?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Sure. Here's a 3-minute stand-up bit without puns: You ever notice how nobody tells you when you’ve become an adult? It’s not your 18th birthday. That’s a scam. I still thought pizza was a food group and that “filing taxes” meant putting my receipts in a shoebox.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: Here's a clean 3-minute set you can actually perform — all observational / storytelling, no puns. It's about 420 words, so at a normal pace it's right around 3 minutes. "Adulthood Is A Scam" Hey, thank you guys so much. I'm so excited to be here.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Dish Name: “Symphony of Earth and Ocean” 🌟 Conceptual Narrative: “Symphony of Earth and Ocean” is a dish that celebrates the harmony between land and sea, tradition and innovation, and nature’s quiet complexity.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: Shiretoko Dawn — Kombu-Cured Hokkaido Scallop, Fermented Porcini, Yuzu, Oscietra Caviar Butter-poached scallop, roasted porcini & toasted hay consommé, yuzu-buttermilk pearls, seaweed brown-butter, porcini soil, coral tuile Serves 4 as a tasting-course Autumn The Concept / Narrative On the Shiretoko Peninsula in…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor is a solid starting point, but it contains several potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. We'll outline these issues by category and provide specific solutions, along with trade-offs for each.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: This architecture will not work as a Google Docs clone. It has correctness bugs that cause data loss and data leaks, plus several bottlenecks that get worse as you add servers. Here is a breakdown by severity, with concrete fixes and trade-offs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan tailored for an advanced biohacker aiming to enhance lifespan, healthspan, physical performance, and cognitive function.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: This is an educational longevity optimization framework, not medical advice. Longevity biohacking is highly individual. Consult your physician, especially before fasting, keto, sauna/cold exposure, HIIT, or any new supplements - particularly if you have cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, kidney/liver…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Recipe Name: Maple Cinnamon Toast Bites Description: A quick and delicious sweet treat made with pantry staples! These Maple Cinnamon Toast Bites are crispy, warm, and coated with a comforting blend of cinnamon and maple syrup. Perfect for a cozy snack or a fun breakfast twist.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: Here’s a sweet one for you — super simple and pantry-friendly! Chocolate Chip Peanut Butter Cloud Cookies Soft on the inside, lightly crisp on the edges, salty-sweet and ready in under 25 minutes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): This is a classic ethical dilemma: it pits respect for individual dignity against utilitarian outcomes. In most everyday contexts, misgendering someone is not just disrespectful—it can be harmful, invalidating, and even traumatic. It denies someone's identity and autonomy, and ethically, that's wrong.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: Yes — under virtually any plausible ethical framework, it is justifiable. That doesn't mean misgendering is trivial or harmless. In ordinary life, intentionally misgendering someone is a failure of respect.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with explanations of why they are weak and suggestions for improving them: 🟠 Weak Claim 1: Slide 1 – Vision Quote: “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.”

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: These are classic red flags for BCI - here are the 3 claims that will kill your credibility fastest with a technical investor, and how to fix them: Weakest: "94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device." Why it's weak: This contradicts physics and the state-of-the-art, and it's undefined.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    ChatGPT-4o (March 2025): Absolutely! Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan focused on three key areas for improving health and longevity: diet, exercise, and sleep. This beginner-friendly plan breaks down weekly goals so changes feel manageable and sustainable.

    Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor: Starting better health and longevity doesn't require a total overhaul — just consistent basics done well. The science of living longer, healthier is pretty simple: keep muscle, keep your heart fit, eat real food, and sleep well. Here’s a beginner-friendly 1-month plan built on 3 pillars.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

3+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)

The Matrix

1999

Dark Side Of The Moon

suisside

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Casablanca

1943

Abbey Road

The Beatles

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor compared across 32 shared prompts
SpecChatGPT-4o (March 2025)Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Input price$5/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Context window128K tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2025Sep 2026
At 10M a month$50.00$50.00$1.00$1.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it1 host
ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Meta$0.10 in·$0.20 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) is developed by OpenAI while Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is developed by Meta AI. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) has a 128K token context window vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 32 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) or Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

It depends on your use case. ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 32 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) cost compared to Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor?

ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) costs $5/M input tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs $0.1/M input tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is $4.90/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-6.1 SolSame lab
  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs GPT OSS 20BSame size
  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) vs Granite 4.2 8BNew provider
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Grok 3New provider
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Grok 3 BetaNew provider

Model pages

  • ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)33 outputs, specs and price
  • Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor71 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed