Claude 3 Haiku
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude 3 Haiku vs Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Compare Claude 3 Haiku and Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22), both from Anthropic, context windows of 200K vs 200K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)?
Claude 3 Haiku and Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) are both competitive models. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $3/M for Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22). Context windows: 200K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3 Haiku and Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Claude 3 Haiku is made by anthropic while Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is from anthropic. Claude 3 Haiku has a 200K token context window compared to Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)'s 200K. On pricing, Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $3/M for Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22).
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Claude 3 HaikuRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Claude 3 Haiku is 12x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
99%
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) uses 5.6x more headings
Claude 3 Haiku
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
50%Vocabulary66%
22wSentence Length74w
0.71Hedging0.72
0.3Bold0.3
5.9Lists8.9
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings0.06
0.08Transitions0.09
Based on 13 + 21 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ