Claude 3 Haiku
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-4o (Omni)
Compare Claude 3 Haiku by Anthropic against GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI, in 1 community votes, gpt-4o (omni) wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or GPT-4o (Omni)?
GPT-4o (Omni) is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-4o (Omni)
Claude 3 Haiku is made by anthropic while GPT-4o (Omni) is from openai. Claude 3 Haiku has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-4o (Omni)'s 128K. On pricing, Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). In community voting, In 1 community votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 1 community votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Our Verdict
GPT-4o (Omni)Winner
Claude 3 HaikuRunner-up
Pick GPT-4o (Omni). In 1 blind votes, GPT-4o (Omni) wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3 Haiku is 8.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
100%
GPT-4o (Omni) uses 2.5x more emoji
Claude 3 Haiku
GPT-4o (Omni)
50%Vocabulary54%
22wSentence Length18w
0.71Hedging0.72
0.3Bold7.3
5.9Lists5.6
0.00Emoji0.03
0.00Headings1.40
0.08Transitions0.26
Based on 13 + 24 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ