Claude Fable 5.1 is cheaper than Claude 3 Opus at $10/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Fable 5.1 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $10/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $50/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2024 | Sep 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $150 | $100 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
Both are developed by Anthropic but target different use cases. Claude 3 Opus has a 200K token context window vs Claude Fable 5.1's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 2 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude 3 Opus and Claude Fable 5.1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 2 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens and Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10/M input tokens. Claude Fable 5.1 is $5.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3 Opus and Claude Fable 5.1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.