GPT-6 Astra Pro is cheaper than Claude 3 Opus at $10/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6 Astra Pro has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $10/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $50/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.1M tokens |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2024 | Sep 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $150 | $100 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic while GPT-6 Astra Pro is developed by OpenAI. Claude 3 Opus has a 200K token context window vs GPT-6 Astra Pro's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 1 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude 3 Opus and GPT-6 Astra Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 1 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens and GPT-6 Astra Pro costs $10/M input tokens. GPT-6 Astra Pro is $5.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3 Opus and GPT-6 Astra Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.