Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Claude 3 Opus by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 4 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 131K, tested across 12 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 4 blind community votes on Rival. Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. Context windows: 200K vs 131K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3 Opus and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Claude 3 Opus is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. Claude 3 Opus has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's 131K. On pricing, Claude 3 Opus costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In community voting, In 4 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 4 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 4+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 4 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Image Generation. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 125x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 571.0x more bold
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
