Skip to content

Rival Research · Stylometrics

178 models,
one fingerprint

178 models, 32 writing dimensions, every one of 15,753 pairs scored. Most write nothing alike. A few write so identically that only the price tag tells them apart. One pair matches 78% yet costs 185x more.
178 models·32 dimensions·15,753 pairs·3,095 responses·12 clone pairs

Every pairwise comparison, by writing similarity

15,753 pairs
most differentcosine 0clones →
Hover a bin to inspect

The mass piles up near zero. Two random models write almost nothing alike. The story is the thin lime tail: 12 clone pairs and 45 near-clones whose fingerprints collapse onto each other.

Key findings

Across 178 models and 15,753 pairwise comparisons, 12 pairs write near-identically (above 90% cosine similarity on a 32-dimension fingerprint), in 9 clusters. The widest price-for-style gap: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17, which writes 78% like Claude 3 Opus at roughly 185x less per token.

Cluster every pair over 90% similarity and 178 models collapse into 9 clusters. Some are siblings from the same lab. Others are strangers from different providers that converged on the exact same voice.

12

model pairs cross the 90% similarity line, the top 0.08% of every comparison we ran. They cluster into 9 groups.

45 more pairs sit in the 80 to 90% near-clone band.

Strip out the same-lab siblings and 30 pairs remain that come from different providers yet write almost identically. Training-data convergence, measured, crossing every brand line.

Pairs over 75% similarity, sorted by what the cheaper one saves you. Same voice, different bill. You are paying for the logo.

Distinctiveness: how tightly a lab's own models write like each other versus like everyone else. Above 1, the lab has a fingerprint of its own. Only 4 labs clear that bar. Most providers, the largest ones included, have no detectable house style.

38x

Meta is the most self-similar lab in the catalog: its models write 38x more like each other than like the field.

4 of the 13 multi-model labs clear the parity line.

Distinctiveness · intra ÷ inter-provider similarity

Meta4 models
37.5x
Zhipu6 models
12.3x
DeepSeek7 models
6.1x
MiniMax6 models
4.1x

A family ships a flagship, a mini, a nano. Do they share a voice? The GPT-5 family is the most coherent at 71.4%. The DeepSeek line barely holds together.

Family size vs internal voice agreement

11 families
05101500.20.40.6models in familyinternal cohesion
Hover a model to inspect

Size predicts nothing here. Big families are not automatically incoherent, small ones not automatically tight. House voice is a choice, not a side effect of scale.

Of the 32 dimensions, a few carry almost all the signal. The loudest differentiator is Sentence length variance. Structural pacing and rhythm are nearly identical across the whole catalog.

2.8

the coefficient of variation on Sentence length variance, the single most discriminating trait. Qwen3 Coder Flash sits at the extreme end.

Spans 41.42 to 44065.63 across 178 models.

Top differentiators · coefficient of variation

Sentence length varianceQwen3 Coder Flash
2.78
Inline codeGPT-4
2.14
EmojiQwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
1.81
EllipsisDeepSeek R1 0528
1.25
ItalicQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
1.18
SemicolonGPT-5
1.17
Em-dashMoonshotAI: Kimi K2 0905
1.11
ExclamationGemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17
1.05
Horizontal ruleClaude Sonnet 4.6
0.91
HeadingGPT-5.4 Pro
0.77

Each caption names the model that pushes that feature furthest. Punctuation and formatting habits (em-dashes, emoji, inline code, italics) do the separating. Everything below the top ten barely moves.

Average a model's similarity to every other model and you get one number: how generic it is. The unique end (lime) is mostly reasoning models writing their own dialect. The generic end clusters around the bland center of the catalog.

The two tails · mean similarity to all other models

Most uniqueMost generic
catalog mean · 0-0.04-0.0200.020.04mean similarity to all models
Hover a model to inspect

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) writes the least like anything else. Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09-2025 sits closest to the average. Even the most generic model only reaches 5.3% mean similarity. That is how spread out the field is.

Style drift is the response-to-response variance inside one model. Low drift means a predictable voice no matter the prompt. High drift means the model reshapes itself per task.

Most consistent

20
0.42
0.54
0.64
0.69
0.72
0.79
0.81

Most variable

20
2.01
1.90
1.86
1.76
1.73
1.67
1.66

FAQ

Questions, answered

Which AI models write the most similarly?
Across 178 models and 15,753 pairwise comparisons, 12 pairs write near-identically (above 90% cosine similarity on a 32-dimension fingerprint), grouping into 9 clusters. Some are same-lab siblings; some are strangers from different providers.
Is there a cheaper model that writes like Claude 3 Opus?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 06-17 (google) writes 78% like Claude 3 Opus (anthropic) at about 185x less per token (roughly 99% cheaper). On writing style alone the cheaper model is largely interchangeable. The price gap pays for the brand and for reasoning depth this measure does not capture.
How was AI model similarity measured?
Each model's responses to 43 standardized prompts reduce to a 32-dimension fingerprint covering lexical richness, sentence structure, punctuation, formatting, and discourse. Features are z-score normalized, then compared with cosine similarity. A pair above 0.90 is a clone (the top 0.08% of all pairs). Corpus: 3,095 responses.
Which AI provider has the most distinct writing style?
Meta has the strongest house style, writing 37.5x more like its own models than like other labs, followed by zhipu (12.3x) and deepseek (6.1x). A distinctiveness above 1 means a detectable writing signature.
Which AI model writes the most uniquely?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) (google) is the most stylistically unique model, with the lowest average similarity to every other model. Reasoning and thinking-mode models dominate the unique end; mid-tier models converge toward an average voice.
What is a stylometric fingerprint?
A stylometric fingerprint is a vector of 32 measurable writing-style features (word length, sentence variance, punctuation rates, formatting habits, hedging and transition patterns) averaged across a model's responses. It captures how a model writes, not what it says. That is why two models can share a fingerprint while differing in capability.

Method

How we measured this

Every model answers the same 43 standardized prompts. Each text response becomes a 32-dimension fingerprint covering lexical richness, sentence structure, punctuation, formatting and discourse. A model's fingerprint is the mean of its responses, minimum 3.

Features are z-score normalized so a high-magnitude trait cannot dominate. Pairwise similarity is cosine similarity on the normalized 32-vector, across all 15,753 pairs.

Cite this

Rival (2026). The Model Similarity Index: 178 AI models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions, 15,753 pairwise comparisons. rival.tips/research/model-similarity

Sign in