Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs GPT-5

Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against GPT-5 by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 400K, tested across 47 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or GPT-5?

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and GPT-5 are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5. Context windows: 200K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and GPT-5

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while GPT-5 is from openai. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-5's 400K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for GPT-5.

Our Verdict
GPT-5
GPT-5
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Slight edge
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
92%

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) uses 5.6x more sentence length

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
GPT-5
66%Vocabulary65%
74wSentence Length13w
0.72Hedging0.20
0.3Bold0.2
8.9Lists4.6
0.00Emoji0.00
0.06Headings0.16
0.09Transitions0.03
Based on 21 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)GPT-5

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions