Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by Moonshot AI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 27 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is from moonshotai. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct.

Our Verdict
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
FAQ