Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by Moonshot AI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) or Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct?
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) is made by anthropic while Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is from moonshotai. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has a 200K token context window compared to Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct.
Per 1M tokens
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 10× input, 25× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct uses 15.7x more bold
