Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
27× cheaper
Output
$0.60
25× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 27× input, 25× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
42%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
66%Vocabulary56%
74wSentence Length14w
0.72Hedging0.37
0.3Bold5.7
8.9Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.06Headings0.70
0.09Transitions0.14
Based on 21 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
