GPT-5vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than GPT-5 at $0.11/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.
| Spec | GPT-5 | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
GPT-5
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5 has the edge: bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 17x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-5
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
11× cheaper
Output
$0.60
17× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 11× input, 17× output.
Where to run it
5 hosts, cheapest first
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25073 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 98.9x more emoji
GPT-5
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
65%Vocabulary56%
13wSentence Length15w
0.20Hedging0.42
0.2Bold6.1
4.6Lists4.3
0.00Emoji0.99
0.16Headings0.70
0.03Transitions0.13
Based on 16 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Grok 3 ThinkingNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Grok 4New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Grok 4 Fast (free)New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Grok 4.1 FastNew provider