Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Compare Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) has the edge — bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 16x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input
$0.16
19× cheaper
Output
$0.97
16× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper on both — 19× input, 16× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
40%
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B uses 160.3x more emoji
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
66%Vocabulary59%
74wSentence Length15w
0.72Hedging0.31
0.3Bold4.9
8.9Lists2.7
0.00Emoji1.60
0.06Headings0.75
0.09Transitions0.05
Based on 21 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
