Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs DeepSeek R1
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek, in 26 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 77% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Web Design: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 75% of votes
Image Generation: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 83% of votes
Reasoning: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetWinner
DeepSeek R1Runner-up
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 26 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 77% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet particularly excels in Reasoning, Image Generation, Web Design. DeepSeek R1 is 14x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
DeepSeek R1
Input
$0.55
11× cheaper
Output
$2.19
14× cheaper
DeepSeek R1 is cheaper on both — 11× input, 14× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
45%
DeepSeek R1 uses 4.3x more emoji
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
DeepSeek R1
61%Vocabulary62%
49wSentence Length15w
0.64Hedging0.52
2.2Bold8.0
4.5Lists5.7
0.00Emoji0.04
1.81Headings0.62
0.21Transitions0.28
Based on 21 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
