Question 1

What is the difference between Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental?

Accepted Answer

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is developed by Google AI. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental's 1.0M. in 402 community votes on RIVAL, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 55% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 42 challenges.

Question 2

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental?

Accepted Answer

Based on 402 community votes on RIVAL, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 55% of head-to-head matchups against Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is strongest in Web Design, Image Generation. However, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental leads in Reasoning, Conversation.

Question 3

How much does Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet cost compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental?

Accepted Answer

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental costs $1/M input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is $5.00/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 55% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

Question 4

How are Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental votes collected on RIVAL?

Accepted Answer

RIVAL presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels — voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one. This eliminates brand bias. 402 votes have been collected for this pair across 42 challenges. All vote data is part of RIVAL's open dataset.

Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

Why Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet?

Why Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental?

Favorites

AI Board Game Logicreasoning