Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against GLM 4.7 Flash by Zhipu AI, context windows of 200K vs 200K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
GLM 4.7 Flash
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GLM 4.7 Flash is 75x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
GLM 4.7 Flash
Input
$0.07
86× cheaper
Output
$0.40
75× cheaper
GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 86× input, 75× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
57%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 3.3x more sentence length
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
GLM 4.7 Flash
61%Vocabulary52%
49wSentence Length15w
0.64Hedging0.33
2.2Bold5.8
4.5Lists4.7
0.00Emoji0.00
1.81Headings0.68
0.21Transitions0.13
Based on 21 + 19 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
