Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Llama 4 Scout
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against Llama 4 Scout by Meta AI, in 9 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 78% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 10.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Web Design: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 80% of votes
Image Generation: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 75% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetWinner
Llama 4 ScoutRunner-up
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 9 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 78% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet particularly excels in Web Design, Image Generation. Llama 4 Scout is 60x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Llama 4 Scout
Input
$0.25
24× cheaper
Output
$0.50
60× cheaper
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper on both — 24× input, 60× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
58%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 6.0x more headings
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Llama 4 Scout
61%Vocabulary43%
49wSentence Length42w
0.64Hedging0.81
2.2Bold4.1
4.5Lists7.3
0.00Emoji0.00
1.81Headings0.30
0.21Transitions0.04
Based on 21 + 10 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
