Rival
Sign Up

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507

Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, tested across 31 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is from qwen. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet costs $6/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 35294x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 44.8x more emoji

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
61%Vocabulary57%
49wSentence Length18w
0.64Hedging0.40
2.2Bold5.9
4.5Lists4.8
0.00Emoji0.45
1.81Headings1.07
0.21Transitions0.11
Based on 21 + 18 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
FAQ
Keep going
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 logoGPT-5 logo
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs GPT-5New provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs MiniMax M2.5New provider