Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Grok 3 Thinking
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against Grok 3 Thinking by xAI, in 19 community votes, claude 3.7 thinking sonnet wins 67% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 14 shared challenges.
Image Generation: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 88% of votes
Web Design: Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 60% of votes
Reasoning: Grok 3 Thinking wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetWinner
Grok 3 ThinkingRunner-up
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet. In 19 blind votes, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet for Image Generation, Web Design. Pick Grok 3 Thinking for Reasoning.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Grok 3 Thinking
Input
—
Output
—
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
55%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 2.8x more headings
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Grok 3 Thinking
61%Vocabulary46%
49wSentence Length19w
0.64Hedging1.11
2.2Bold3.3
4.5Lists2.6
0.00Emoji0.00
1.81Headings0.64
0.21Transitions0.25
Based on 21 + 6 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
