Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 2 community votes, qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetRunner-up
Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 2 blind votes, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 50x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
55× cheaper
Output
$0.60
50× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 55× input, 50× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
36%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
61%Vocabulary56%
49wSentence Length14w
0.64Hedging0.37
2.2Bold5.7
4.5Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
1.81Headings0.70
0.21Transitions0.14
Based on 21 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
