Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 500K, tested across 21 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking. Context windows: 200K vs 500K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is from google. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's 500K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.
Per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper on both — 12× input, 30× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 30x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 53.2x more headings
