Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 500K, tested across 21 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 30x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input
$0.25
12× cheaper
Output
$0.50
30× cheaper
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper on both — 12× input, 30× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
49%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 53.2x more headings
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
62%Vocabulary54%
35wSentence Length15w
0.99Hedging0.64
1.2Bold3.8
4.3Lists2.4
0.00Emoji0.00
1.78Headings0.03
0.23Transitions0.30
Based on 13 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
