What is the difference between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is developed by Google AI. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)?

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude 3.7 Sonnet cost compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) costs $0.175/M input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is $2.83/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is developed by Google AI. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)?

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude 3.7 Sonnet cost compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) costs $0.175/M input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is $2.83/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking): Which Is Better?

Updated Apr 2025

Our Verdict

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is 4.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Input

$3.00

Output

$15.00

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)

Input

$0.17

17× cheaper

Output

$3.50

4.3× cheaper

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is cheaper on both — 17× input, 4.3× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

44%

Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 177.5x more headings

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)

62%Vocabulary53%

35wSentence Length14w

0.99Hedging0.38

1.2Bold4.4

4.3Lists4.1

0.00Emoji0.00

1.78Headings0.00

0.23Transitions0.24

Based on 13 + 7 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs MiniMax M3New provider

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5New provider

Updated Apr 2025

Our Verdict

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is 4.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Input

$3.00

Output

$15.00

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)

Input

$0.17

17× cheaper

Output

$3.50

4.3× cheaper

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is cheaper on both — 17× input, 4.3× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

44%

Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 177.5x more headings

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)

62%Vocabulary53%

35wSentence Length14w

0.99Hedging0.38

1.2Bold4.4

4.3Lists4.1

0.00Emoji0.00

1.78Headings0.00

0.23Transitions0.24

Based on 13 + 7 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs MiniMax M3New provider

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-5New provider