Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.13/M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is from google. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B's 262K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.13/M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B.

Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 38x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B uses 5.6x more bold

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
62%Vocabulary58%
35wSentence Length18w
0.99Hedging0.31
1.2Bold6.8
4.3Lists3.3
0.00Emoji0.00
1.78Headings0.74
0.23Transitions0.15
Based on 13 + 27 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude 3.7 SonnetGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B
FAQ