Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Llama 3.1 405B

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Llama 3.1 405B by Meta AI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 6 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Llama 3.1 405B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Llama 3.1 405B are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Llama 3.1 405B

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Llama 3.1 405B is from meta. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Llama 3.1 405B's 128K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $2.7/M for Llama 3.1 405B.

Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Llama 3.1 405B
Llama 3.1 405B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Llama 3.1 405B is 4.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude 3.7 SonnetLlama 3.1 405B
FAQ