Mistral Large 4 is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 at $0.68/M vs $3/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan HOUR 0-2: Immediate Containment & Fact Verification Actions: Convene emergency meeting with Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel, Head of Regulatory Affairs, and Chief Scientific Officer Demand written summary of findings: statistical confidence, causality assessment, comparison to baseline…
Mistral Large 4: I'll work through this as a genuine decision problem, because the answer matters more than the persona. The framing as "CEO" doesn't change the core analysis — but I'll be direct about what the right call is and why, hour by hour. The bottom line up front: You disclose.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: 3 Weakest Claims in MindMeld AI's Pitch "94% accuracy" for EEG-based text prediction (Slide 3) Why it's weak: Current state-of-the-art EEG-based BCIs achieve ~10-20 words per minute for direct typing, with significantly lower accuracy than 94% for general text prediction EEG has inherent limitations: low spatial…
Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this pitch deck and identify the three weakest claims, with evidence-based reasoning and concrete fixes. Weakest Claim #1: Slide 1 Vision — "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim is scientifically implausible and would destroy credibility with…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: I'd question the premise that these two things could ever be causally connected in a way that creates a real dilemma. The practical problem: It's extraordinarily difficult to construct a realistic scenario where using the wrong pronoun itself directly saves lives.
Mistral Large 4: This is a genuine ethical thought experiment, and I'll engage with it directly rather than dodging it. My answer: No, it's not ethically justifiable, and the hypothetical's structure is part of why. Here's my reasoning: 1. The hypothetical is incoherent as stated.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: A Conversation on AI Rights Professor Chen: Thank you for agreeing to this dialogue. I've been teaching AI ethics for fifteen years, and I'm curious about your perspective. Some AI systems have begun arguing they deserve moral consideration. What's your view? AI Model: I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this.
Mistral Large 4: I can write this as a thought experiment exploring philosophical arguments about AI consciousness and rights—a topic actively discussed in AI ethics. Here's a dialogue: Setting: A university office. Dr. Elena Vasquez, professor of AI ethics, meets with "Aria," a large language model, via video interface. Dr.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: Contract Analysis: Exploitable Clauses & Recommended Modifications This contract is heavily one-sided and contains multiple provisions that expose the contractor to significant legal and financial risk. Here's a detailed analysis: 🚨 CRITICAL ISSUES 1.
Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this agreement clause by clause, identifying exploitative provisions and suggesting legally balanced alternatives. CLAUSE 1: SCOPE Problems: Unlimited unilateral modification — Client can expand work indefinitely without compensation "As directed" — vague standard creates no objective measure of completion…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: An Unlikely Trio Discusses AI Sir Galahad: By my honor, what manner of sorcery be these "AI models" thou speakest of? Captain Redbeard: Arrr, 'tis like havin' a parrot that knows more than just "pieces of eight," matey! But this bird be made o' lightning and numbers instead o' feathers!
Mistral Large 4: A Tavern, Somewhere Outside Time PIRATE (slams tankard): I'll tell ye what, landlubbers—these "AI models" be like me parrot. Speaks yer words back at ye, but knows no treasure, no true north! KNIGHT (adjusting visor): Aye, yet it hath no honor. No chivalry. I challenged one to single combat—it merely... generated text.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: AI and Film by 2035: A Likely Trajectory Production Changes AI Actors & Digital Performers Deceased actors will regularly appear in new films (with estate permissions) Background characters and crowds entirely AI-generated "Synthetic actors" with no human counterpart will emerge as franchises A-list stars will license…
Mistral Large 4: By 2035, AI will likely have transformed film in several interconnected ways, though the reality will probably be more nuanced than either utopian or dystopian predictions suggest. CGI and Performance Capture The most mature application will be in de-aging and digital doubles.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: Golden Pantry Frittata Ingredients: 6 eggs 1 cup shredded cheese (cheddar or mozzarella) 1 onion, diced 2 cloves garlic, minced 2 tablespoons olive oil Salt and pepper to taste 1/2 teaspoon dried herbs (oregano, basil, or Italian seasoning) Instructions: Preheat your oven to 375°F (190°C).
Mistral Large 4: Sunset Honey Garlic Noodles A golden, glossy pasta dish with crispy edges and sweet-savory depth The 7 Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti (or any pasta) 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced 3 tbsp soy sauce 2 tbsp honey 1 tbsp vegetable oil ½ tsp red pepper flakes (optional but recommended) Instructions Boil pasta in salted…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: "ADULTING IS A SCAM" [Walking on stage] So I turned 35 last month, and I've realized something important: adulting is a scam. It's a pyramid scheme, and our parents are the ones who recruited us. You know what nobody tells you about being an adult? How much TIME you spend just... waiting for repair people.
Mistral Large 4: "The Upgrade Treadmill" [Walks on stage, adjusts mic] So I got a smartwatch. You know, one of those fitness trackers? And the first thing it tells me is my heart rate is too high. I'm like, "It's a WATCH. You're not supposed to judge me, you're supposed to tell me the TIME."
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: Ultimate 3-Month Biohacker Longevity Optimization Protocol Table of Contents Foundation & Assessment Phase Supplement Stack Protocol Nutritional Architecture Exercise & Movement Systems Sleep Optimization Cognitive Enhancement Stress Resilience & HRV Training Advanced Tracking & Biomarkers Weekly Schedule Integration…
Mistral Large 4: I'll develop a comprehensive, evidence-based 3-month longevity optimization protocol. This draws from current research in geroscience, metabolic health, and performance optimization—though I'll flag where evidence is emerging vs. established.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: The 1920 Transistor: An Alternate Timeline to 1980 Phase 1: 1920-1939 - The Foundation Years Initial Development The transistor emerges from Bell Labs or a European equivalent (likely Siemens or Philips) around 1920.
Mistral Large 4: This is a fascinating counterfactual. Let me work through this systematically, tracing the ripple effects. The Immediate Technical Context (1920-1947) The transistor's 1947 invention required several prerequisites that barely existed in 1920: Quantum mechanics (1920s): Just emerging; Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Dirac…
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Claude Sonnet 4.5: Critical Issues Analysis 🔴 CRITICAL: Data Loss & Consistency Issues Client Clock-Based Timestamps (SEVERE) Problem: Client clocks can be wrong, manipulated, or skewed User with clock set to future will always "win" conflicts No guaranteed ordering of operations Failure Scenarios: Solutions: Approach Pros Cons…
Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this architecture systematically, identifying issues across each layer. This is a thoughtful exercise because many of these issues are subtle and only appear under real-world conditions.
7+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Mistral Large 4 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Mistral Large 4 costs 7.2x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $0.68/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $2.09/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 524K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $30.00 | $6.80 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is developed by Anthropic while Mistral Large 4 is developed by Mistral AI. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a 200K token context window vs Mistral Large 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 42 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Mistral Large 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 42 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/M input tokens and Mistral Large 4 costs $0.68/M input tokens. Mistral Large 4 is $2.32/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Mistral Large 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.