Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, in 7 community votes, qwen: qwen3.5 397b a17b wins 57% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 42 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is the better choice overall, winning 57% of 7 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is from qwen. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. In community voting, In 7 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 57% of head-to-head duels.
In 7 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 57% of head-to-head duels. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 7+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge overall. In 7 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 57% of the time.
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B particularly excels in Image Generation. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 uses 6.5x more sentence length
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.








