GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 at $1/M vs $10/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Fable 5.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer. GPT-5.6 Luna costs 8.3x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.1M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $100 | $10.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic while GPT-5.6 Luna is developed by OpenAI. Claude Fable 5.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs GPT-5.6 Luna's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Luna each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10/M input tokens and GPT-5.6 Luna costs $1/M input tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna is $9.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Luna across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.