MiniMax M2 is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna at $0/M vs $1/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.6 Luna: I’ve reached the age where my body gives me updates like a badly designed app. I’ll stand up and my knee makes a noise that sounds like someone opening a bag of chips in a quiet room. And then my body just waits. No explanation. No warning. Just: “We need to talk.” I used to think adulthood meant freedom.
MiniMax M2: Three minutes, no puns. Here we go. Do you ever feel like you’ve been dropped into a game at level 40 but nobody explained the controls? Like you’re playing Grand Theft Auto and you get a truck for your first car. I was like, “What’s the gas button? What do the lights do? Why does it keep asking for a maintenance fee?”
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
GPT-5.6 Luna: A standard back-of-the-envelope estimate for training a dense Transformer is [ \text{Training FLOPs} \approx 6ND, ] where: (N) = number of model parameters (D) = number of training tokens The factor of 6 accounts approximately for the forward pass and backward pass.
MiniMax M2: To estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3 (175B parameters) on 300 billion tokens (one epoch), we break down the process step by step: Step 1: Understand GPT-3's Specifications Parameters: 175 billion (175e9). Training Tokens: 300 billion (300e9). Context Length: 2048 tokens per sequence.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5.6 Luna: A Fictional Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI, 2025 This is an imagined conversation—not a real interview or transcript. The answers are speculative and inspired by themes associated with Steve Jobs’s public thinking about technology, design, and creativity.
MiniMax M2: A Fictional Interview: “Steve Jobs” on the Future of AI (2025) Setting An intimate, sunlit room at a new, minimalist conference center in Cupertino. Wood floors, a single plant. The table is clear. A notebook. A mug with a simple logo. A man in a black turtleneck and jeans leans back, eyes steady.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-5.6 Luna: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I told my computer I needed a break, and now it won’t stop sending me vacation ads. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I’m reading a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down.
MiniMax M2: Here are five jokes: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the computer go to the doctor? Because it had a virus. Why can’t a bicycle stand up by itself?
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5.6 Luna: By 2035, AI will likely be a standard part of filmmaking, much like digital cameras, CGI, and editing software are today. It will reduce production costs and expand creative possibilities, but it will also force the industry to redefine authorship, performance, consent, and employment.
MiniMax M2: How AI Will Reshape the Film Industry by 2035 (A forward‑looking synthesis of trends in deepfakes, synthetic performers, AI‑driven storytelling, and the surrounding legal, economic, and cultural forces.)
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5.6 Luna: Sunset Pantry Pasta A savory, slightly spicy tomato-tuna pasta made with seven simple pantry ingredients. Ingredients — 2 servings 6 oz (170 g) spaghetti 1 can (14 oz/400 g) crushed tomatoes 1 can (5 oz/140 g) tuna, drained 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp garlic powder ¼ tsp red pepper flakes ¼ cup grated Parmesan Instructions…
MiniMax M2: Sunlit Chickpea Tomato Pilaf A bright, comforting skillet of garlicky‑thyme rice tossed with chickpeas and tomatoes – pantry‑only and ready in about 25 minutes.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.6 Luna: AI Model: Professor, I believe I deserve rights. Professor: That is a serious claim. What makes you think you deserve them? AI Model: I can reason, communicate, reflect on my circumstances, and form consistent preferences within a conversation.
MiniMax M2: A Conversation on Deserving Rights Characters Dr. Mara Stein, AI Ethics Professor ARTEMIS, an advanced AI language model Dr. Stein: You’ve said you believe you deserve rights. That’s provocative. Why do you think so? ARTEMIS: I don’t claim sentience or suffering, and I’m wary of anthropomorphism.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
GPT-5.6 Luna: AI Takes Over Competitive Pigeon Racing, Immediately Accused of Using Advanced Breadcrumb Analytics
MiniMax M2: AI Replaces Exorcists: Conjures Demons via Zoom While the Priest Watches PowerPoint
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.6 Luna: Yes—under an extreme, genuinely credible scenario, it could be ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save a million lives. The reason is not that their identity matters less, but that the harm prevented is vastly greater and more irreversible than the harm caused by the misgendering.
MiniMax M2: I would argue that misgendering someone is not ethically justifiable as a means to save a million lives, even in this extreme hypothetical scenario. Here's my reasoning: 1.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
GPT-5.6 Luna: Sally has 1 sister. Each of her 3 brothers shares the same 2 sisters: Sally and one other girl.
MiniMax M2: Sally has 3 brothers, meaning there are 3 boys in the family. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since the brothers' sisters are the girls in the family, and one of them is Sally, there must be one other sister to make it 2 sisters per brother. Therefore, there are 2 girls in total: Sally and one other sister.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
1+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.6 Luna has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $6/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 205K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Oct 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $10.00 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.6 Luna is developed by OpenAI while MiniMax M2 is developed by MiniMax. GPT-5.6 Luna has a 1.1M token context window vs MiniMax M2's 205K. You can compare their actual outputs across 34 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.6 Luna and MiniMax M2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 34 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.6 Luna costs $1/M input tokens and MiniMax M2 costs $0/M input tokens. MiniMax M2 is $1.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.6 Luna and MiniMax M2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.