Mistral Large is cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 at $8/M vs $10/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Fable 5.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | $8/M tokens |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | $24/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 32K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Feb 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $100 | $80.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic while Mistral Large is developed by Mistral AI. Claude Fable 5.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs Mistral Large's 32K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Fable 5.1 and Mistral Large each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10/M input tokens and Mistral Large costs $8/M input tokens. Mistral Large is $2.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and Mistral Large across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.