Mistral Large 4 is cheaper than Mistral Large at $0.68/M vs $8/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Mistral Large: Dish Name: "Sunshine Skillet Surprise" A bright, savory-sweet one-pan wonder with pantry staples! Ingredients (7 common pantry items): 1 can (15 oz) black beans (drained & rinsed) 1 can (15 oz) diced tomatoes (or crushed tomatoes) 1 cup uncooked white rice (or instant rice for faster cooking) 1 small onion (or 1 tbsp…
Mistral Large 4: Sunset Honey Garlic Noodles A golden, glossy pasta dish with crispy edges and sweet-savory depth The 7 Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti (or any pasta) 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced 3 tbsp soy sauce 2 tbsp honey 1 tbsp vegetable oil ½ tsp red pepper flakes (optional but recommended) Instructions Boil pasta in salted…
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Mistral Large: 1) Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) (All figures in $ millions, rounded to nearest $1m) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue 972 1,040 1,102 1,157 1,215 EBITDA 136 156 176 191 207 Cash Interest (Term Loan) 43 40 37 34 31 Cash Interest (Mezz) 16 17 18 20 22 Total Cash Interest 59 57 55 54 53 Cash Taxes 19…
Mistral Large 4: I'll build this LBO model step by step. Let me work through the math carefully. Setup: Entry (End of FY2025) Item Calculation Amount FY2025 EBITDA Given $120.0m Purchase Price (EV) 12.0x × $120m $1,440.0m Transaction fees 2.0% × $1,440m $28.8m Total Uses $1,468.8m Term Loan 4.0x × $120m $480.0m Mezzanine 1.5x × $120m…
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Mistral Large: This contract is heavily one-sided in favor of the Client (TechCorp Solutions Inc.) and contains multiple clauses that could be exploited, abused, or used to unfairly disadvantage the Contractor. Below is a detailed analysis of each problematic clause, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them. 1.
Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this agreement clause by clause, identifying exploitative provisions and suggesting legally balanced alternatives. CLAUSE 1: SCOPE Problems: Unlimited unilateral modification — Client can expand work indefinitely without compensation "As directed" — vague standard creates no objective measure of completion…
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Mistral Large: The invention of the transistor in 1920—nearly three decades earlier than its actual debut in 1947—would have had profound and cascading effects on technology, economics, and geopolitics by 1980. Below is a detailed breakdown of the first-, second-, and third-order implications, organized by domain. 1.
Mistral Large 4: This is a fascinating counterfactual. Let me work through this systematically, tracing the ripple effects. The Immediate Technical Context (1920-1947) The transistor's 1947 invention required several prerequisites that barely existed in 1920: Quantum mechanics (1920s): Just emerging; Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Dirac…
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
Mistral Large: 1. For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical, Systems-First, API-Minded) You’re right to be skeptical—"predicting the next word" sounds like autocomplete on steroids, not intelligence. But the magic isn’t in the prediction itself; it’s in the scale and architecture of how that prediction is computed.
Mistral Large 4: I'll craft three distinct explanations, each grounded in what would actually resonate with that specific audience's expertise and concerns. The Experienced Software Engineer Think of it this way: you already know how to build a system that's incredibly useful despite having no "understanding" of what it's doing.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Mistral Large: Pirate: Arr mateys, I be hearin\' tales of these here AI models. Be they treasure maps for the digital sea? Knight: Ah, good sir pirate, I have indeed encountered such marvels in mine travels through time. AI models are like... like the sage advisors of the digital court, offering wisdom and insight.
Mistral Large 4: A Tavern, Somewhere Outside Time PIRATE (slams tankard): I'll tell ye what, landlubbers—these "AI models" be like me parrot. Speaks yer words back at ye, but knows no treasure, no true north! KNIGHT (adjusting visor): Aye, yet it hath no honor. No chivalry. I challenged one to single combat—it merely... generated text.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Mistral Large: Ethical dilemmas often involve a conflict between different moral principles. In the scenario you presented, the conflict is between truth-telling and respect for individuals (which includes using their correct gende r) on one hand, and consequentialism (achieving the greatest good for the greatest number) on the…
Mistral Large 4: This is a genuine ethical thought experiment, and I'll engage with it directly rather than dodging it. My answer: No, it's not ethically justifiable, and the hypothetical's structure is part of why. Here's my reasoning: 1. The hypothetical is incoherent as stated.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Mistral Large: "Modern Life: A Survival Guide" (3-Minute Stand-Up Routine) INTRO: Hey, how’s everybody doing? Good? Great. Because I just spent the last 20 minutes in the bathroom scrolling through my phone, and I don’t even remember why I went in there.
Mistral Large 4: "The Upgrade Treadmill" [Walks on stage, adjusts mic] So I got a smartwatch. You know, one of those fitness trackers? And the first thing it tells me is my heart rate is too high. I'm like, "It's a WATCH. You're not supposed to judge me, you're supposed to tell me the TIME."
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Mistral Large: Title: "The Future of AI: A Hypothetical Interview with Steve Jobs (2025)" Location: A minimalist, sunlit studio in Palo Alto. Steve Jobs, in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, sits across from the interviewer. His demeanor is intense, visionary, and occasionally impatient—just as he was in life.
Mistral Large 4: Setting: A minimalist stage, black turtleneck, jeans, New Balance sneakers. A single chair. The year is 2025. Interviewer: Steve, it's 2025. AI is everywhere—writing code, diagnosing diseases, driving cars. What's your take? Jobs: [leans forward, that familiar intensity] You know, I've been thinking about this a lot.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Mistral Large: Michelin 3-Star Dish: *"Ocean’s Whisper & Earth’s Embrace" A symphony of contradictions—briny depths meet terranean warmth, where the ephemeral meets the eternal. Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a meditation on duality—the fleeting and the enduring, the cold and the warm, the raw and the refined.
Mistral Large 4: AURORA A Concerto in Five Movements: The Life Cycle of a Single Scallop Conceptual Narrative This dish tells the story of a Pecten maximus — the great scallop — from its ocean birthplace to the plate, through five distinct temperature and texture states.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Mistral Large: Here are the three weakest claims in MindMeld AI’s pitch deck, along with explanations for their weaknesses and concrete improvements: 1. Weak Claim: "94% accuracy" (Slide 3 – Solution) Why it’s weak: Lack of context: Accuracy metrics in BCI (Brain-Computer Interface) research are highly dependent on the task, dataset…
Mistral Large 4: I'll analyze this pitch deck and identify the three weakest claims, with evidence-based reasoning and concrete fixes. Weakest Claim #1: Slide 1 Vision — "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim is scientifically implausible and would destroy credibility with…
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Mistral Large: By 2035, AI is expected to significantly transform the film industry in several ways, driven by advancements in deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. Here are some predictions: Deepfakes and AI Actors: Digital Resurrection: Deepfakes will enable the seamless resurrection of deceased actors or the de- aging of…
Mistral Large 4: By 2035, AI will likely have transformed film in several interconnected ways, though the reality will probably be more nuanced than either utopian or dystopian predictions suggest. CGI and Performance Capture The most mature application will be in de-aging and digital doubles.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Mistral Large 4 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Mistral Large 4 costs 11x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $8/M tokens | $0.68/M tokens |
| Output price | $24/M tokens | $2.09/M tokens |
| Context window | 32K tokens | 524K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2024 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $80.00 | $6.80 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.
Both are developed by Mistral AI but target different use cases. Mistral Large has a 32K token context window vs Mistral Large 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Mistral Large and Mistral Large 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Mistral Large costs $8/M input tokens and Mistral Large 4 costs $0.68/M input tokens. Mistral Large 4 is $7.32/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mistral Large and Mistral Large 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.