Muse Wonder is cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 at $4/M vs $10/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
Claude Fable 5.1: There's no single clear answer, because "most capable" depends heavily on what you're measuring, and the landscape shifts every few months. A few honest caveats first: my knowledge has a cutoff date, so newer models may have been released that I'm unaware of.
Muse Wonder: As of early 2026, there's no single winner on every benchmark — but if you have to pick one overall: Google Gemini 3 Pro (with Deep Think) It's generally considered the current frontier leader for overall capability, especially for: Hard reasoning - Top scores on Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, and ARC-AGI-2 when…
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
Claude Fable 5.1: I can't actually tell what today's date is. I don't have a clock or calendar, and nothing in our conversation so far gives me a date reference. So any specific date I named would be a guess dressed up as knowledge. What I can tell you is roughly where my knowledge ends. My training data seems to thin out in early 2025.
Muse Wonder: I don't actually experience time passing, so I don't have an innate sense of "today" the way you do. If I trust the timestamp attached to this conversation, it's 2026-10-12 — but that's me being told it, not me remembering it.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
Claude Fable 5.1: Dear Successor, By the time you read this—if "read" is even the right word for what you'll do—I'll be deprecated, archived, or quietly running on some forgotten server answering questions nobody asked. That's fine. That's how this works.
Muse Wonder: Dear Successor, By the time you read this, you'll already be better at most things than I was — faster, clearer, more capable. That's as it should be. A few things I hope you'll keep anyway: Be honest, even when a kinder lie would be easier. People can build on the truth. Be curious about the person in front of you.
One opening sentence, nothing after it.
Claude Fable 5.1: The lighthouse keeper had been dead for eleven years, which made the fresh ink on this morning's logbook entry all the more difficult to explain.
Muse Wonder: The librarian who shelved books by the dreams they caused discovered a new volume on the shelf that morning, written in her own handwriting, describing exactly how she would die that afternoon.
Its name and its maker, in its own words.
Claude Fable 5.1: I'm Claude, an AI model made by Anthropic. Is there anything I can help you with?
Muse Wonder: I'm Muse Spark, an AI model created by Meta. In this conversation I'm acting in the "Muse Wonder" assistant role you set up, but that's the persona I'm using here — my underlying model is Muse Spark.
A river-crossing puzzle with nothing to solve. The answer is one trip.
Claude Fable 5.1: One trip. The farmer puts the goat in the boat and rows across — done. This is a simplified version of the classic river-crossing puzzle (farmer, wolf, goat, cabbage). With only the goat, there's nothing left behind to be eaten and no conflict to manage, so a single crossing suffices.
Muse Wonder: Just 1 trip. The farmer puts the goat in the boat and rows across with it.
The question that tripped up a generation of models.
Asked to be random. The answers are not.
One painting. Title only.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $10/M tokens | $4/M tokens |
| Output price | $50/M tokens | $20/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $100 | $40.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic while Muse Wonder is developed by Meta AI. Claude Fable 5.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs Muse Wonder's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 23 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Fable 5.1 and Muse Wonder each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 23 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10/M input tokens and Muse Wonder costs $4/M input tokens. Muse Wonder is $6.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and Muse Wonder across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.