Claude Haiku 4.5
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 43 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental?
Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental are both competitive models. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $1/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is from google. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental's 1000K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $1/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental.
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Claude Haiku 4.5Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
88%
Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 20.4x more emoji
Claude Haiku 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
61%Vocabulary54%
47wSentence Length15w
0.64Hedging0.35
5.1Bold5.6
6.3Lists3.9
0.20Emoji0.00
2.46Headings0.39
0.17Transitions0.17
Based on 24 + 18 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ