Claude Haiku 4.5
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B are both competitive models. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is from qwen. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Claude Haiku 4.5Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
97%
Claude Haiku 4.5 uses 3.3x more sentence length
Claude Haiku 4.5
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
61%Vocabulary54%
47wSentence Length14w
0.64Hedging0.39
5.1Bold6.9
6.3Lists4.2
0.20Emoji0.23
2.46Headings0.93
0.17Transitions0.17
Based on 24 + 23 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ