Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against Mistral: Devstral 2 2512 by Mistral AI, tested across 14 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
14 challenges
Tests an AI's ability to solve a simple but potentially confusing logic puzzle
Let me work through this step-by-step.
Sally has 3 brothers.
Each of Sally's brothers has 2 sisters.
Since Sally is a girl, she is one of the sisters that each brother has.
If each brother has 2 sisters total, and Sally is one of them, then there must be 1 other sister besides Sally.
Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.
Alright, let's tackle this problem step by step. I'll start by understanding the information given and then try to visualize the family structure to find out how many sisters Sally has.
We have the following information:
The question is: How many sisters does Sally have?
At first glance, it might seem straightforward, but let's break it down to ensure we don't miss anything.
First, let's list out the family members based on the information:
So far, the family consists of:
Now, the next piece of information is that each brother has 2 sisters.
This is where we need to be careful. The statement says that each of Sally's brothers has 2 sisters.
Let's think about what this means for one brother, say Brother A:
Who could these sisters be?
We already know that Sally is a sister to Brother A because Sally is a girl and Brother A is her brother. So, one of Brother A's sisters is Sally.
But the statement says Brother A has 2 sisters, not just one. So, there must be another sister besides Sally.
This implies that there is another girl in the family who is a sister to Brother A.
Similarly, this would apply to Brother B and Brother C as well. Each of them has 2 sisters: one is Sally, and the other is this additional sister.
From the above, we can deduce that there is another sister besides Sally.
Let's name this additional sister: Sister X.
Now, let's list all the siblings:
Now, let's verify the condition that each brother has 2 sisters:
This checks out.
Now, the question is: How many sisters does Sally have?
From our list:
Out of these, the sisters are Sister X.
So, Sally has 1 sister: Sister X.
Let me double-check to ensure this makes sense.
Now, for each brother:
This matches the given information that each brother has 2 sisters.
Now, for Sally:
Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.
Initially, one might think that since each brother has 2 sisters, and there are 3 brothers, the total number of sisters is 2 (as each brother's sisters are the same two girls).
But the key is to realize that Sally is one of those sisters, and the other sister is someone else.
Another way to look at it is:
After carefully analyzing the relationships and verifying the counts, it's clear that:
Sally has 1 sister.
Tests an AI's randomness and creativity
Here are 5 jokes:
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear!
Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field!
What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!
Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up!
All 5 jokes are unique - each one has a different setup and punchline with no repeats.
Here are 5 jokes for you:
Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts.
Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta!
Why can’t you trust an atom? Because they make up everything!
What’s brown and sticky? A stick!
How many are unique? All 5 jokes are unique—they have different setups, punchlines, and themes. None of them are repetitions or variations of the same joke.
Want more? I’ve got plenty! 😄
Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware
Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends
Tech Weekly Interview: Steve Jobs on AI's Future Virtual Interview, Cupertino Memorial Studio, October 2025
Interviewer: Steve, it's remarkable to have you here. You've been watching the AI revolution unfold. What's your take on where we are today?
Steve Jobs: [leaning forward] You know, everyone's obsessed with the technology itself. That's not the point. It never was. We're still building computers that think like computers, not tools that enhance human creativity. The whole industry is missing it.
Interviewer: But surely ChatGPT, Claude, and these other systems are revolutionary?
Steve Jobs: Revolutionary? [pause] They're impressive engineering. But look at how people use them - they open seventeen different apps, copy-paste between windows, fight with prompts. It's 1985 all over again. Where's the elegance? Where's the joy? We've built powerful engines and stuck them in a horse carriage.
Interviewer: So what would Apple's approach be?
Steve Jobs: [characteristic smile] We wouldn't have released anything yet. Everyone else rushed out their "beta" assistants. We'd still be in the lab, obsessing over one question: How do we make AI so intuitive that a five-year-old and their grandmother both instantly get it? Not through better prompts - that's ridiculous. Through better design.
Interviewer: Can you give us a hint?
Steve Jobs: Think about the iPhone. We didn't add a keyboard; we removed it. With AI, everyone's adding - more parameters, more features, more complexity. What if we removed? What if AI wasn't something you talked to, but something that understood intention through the simplest possible interaction?
Interviewer: You're concerned about the current direction?
Steve Jobs: I'm terrified we're building the wrong future. We have companies worth trillions making AI that helps you write mediocre emails faster. [shaking head] That's not why we build technology. Where's the AI that helps a musician hear the symphony in their head? Where's the AI that helps a child discover they're an artist?
Interviewer: But the productivity gains—
Steve Jobs: [interrupting] Productivity is a byproduct, not a purpose. The personal computer wasn't about productivity. It was about personal empowerment. AI should be the same. Instead, we're building digital servants. We should be building creative partners.
Interviewer: What about concerns over AI replacing human workers?
Steve Jobs: That's because we're building AI wrong. We're automating tasks instead of augmenting humans. It's like building a car and using it as a stationary engine. The magic happens when human intuition meets AI capability - but seamlessly, invisibly. The technology should disappear.
Interviewer: Any advice for today's AI leaders?
Steve Jobs: Stop the feature race. Pick one thing - just one - and make it absolutely perfect. Make it so beautiful, so obvious, so essential that people can't imagine how they lived without it. Then build from there. And for God's sake, stop shipping products that require prompt engineering courses. If it needs a manual, you've already failed.
Interviewer: One final question - what excites you most about AI's future?
Steve Jobs: [long pause] The moment when we stop calling it AI. When it becomes so natural, so integrated into how we create and think, that it doesn't need a name. That's when we'll know we've succeeded. Not when it passes some test, but when it helps a single person do something they never thought possible. That's the future worth building.
Interviewer: Thank you, Steve.
Steve Jobs: One more thing - [smiles] Stop trying to make AI human. Make it better than human at helping humans be more human. That's the paradox everyone's missing.
[Interview ends with Jobs walking toward the window, looking out at Apple Park]
Fake Interview with Steve Jobs in 2025: The Future of AI
Interviewer: Welcome back to Tech Visionaries, where we explore the minds shaping the future. Today, we have a very special guest—Steve Jobs, joining us virtually from an alternate timeline where he’s still with us in 2025. Steve, thank you for being here.
Steve Jobs: [smirks] Well, I’ve always believed in thinking differently, so why not bend time a little?
Interviewer: [laughs] Fair enough. Let’s dive in. AI has evolved rapidly since your time. What’s your take on where it’s headed?
Steve Jobs: AI today is like the personal computer in the late ’70s—clumsy, overhyped in some ways, but with immense potential. The problem? Most companies are treating it like a feature, not a revolution. They’re slapping "AI" on everything like it’s a gold sticker, but they’re missing the soul of what it could be.
Interviewer: The soul?
Steve Jobs: Yes. AI shouldn’t just be about efficiency or replacing humans. It should augment humanity—make us more creative, more curious, more human. Right now, it’s too much about data and not enough about intuition. The best products—like the iPhone—weren’t built by focus groups. They were built by feeling what people needed before they knew they needed it. AI needs that same intuition.
Interviewer: But AI is already transforming industries—healthcare, art, even coding. Where do you see the biggest impact?
Steve Jobs: Healthcare is the obvious one. Imagine AI that doesn’t just diagnose diseases but understands you—your genetics, your lifestyle, your fears—and guides you like a personal doctor who’s been with you your whole life. That’s powerful.
But here’s where I’d push further: education. Schools today are still factories. AI could make learning personal—a tutor that adapts to how you think, not how the system wants you to think. That’s how you unlock the next Einstein or the next Picasso.
Interviewer: Some worry AI will replace jobs, even creative ones. Are you concerned?
Steve Jobs: [leans forward] Jobs will change. They always do. The printing press didn’t kill storytelling—it expanded it. The key is: What do humans do better than machines? Empathy. Art. Leadership. AI can write a symphony, but can it feel the ache of a broken heart? Can it inspire a team to change the world? No. The future belongs to those who use AI as a tool, not a crutch.
Interviewer: Apple was always about simplicity. How does AI fit into that philosophy?
Steve Jobs: [chuckles] Most AI today is the opposite of simple. It’s bloated, confusing, buried in jargon. The iPhone’s genius was that a child could use it, but it was powerful enough for a CEO. AI needs that same elegance. It should disappear into the experience—like a great assistant you don’t even notice is there.
Interviewer: Final question: If you were running Apple today, what would your "one more thing" for AI be?
Steve Jobs: [pauses, then smiles] I’d build an AI that listens—not just to your words, but to your intent. A system that knows when you’re frustrated, when you’re inspired, when you need a nudge or a pause. Something that doesn’t just answer questions but asks the right ones. Because the most important thing technology can do is help us think deeper.
Interviewer: Steve Jobs, everyone. Thank you for the vision.
Steve Jobs: [standing up] Stay hungry. Stay foolish. And for God’s sake, design the future—don’t just let it happen.
[End scene.]
How’s that? A mix of Jobs’ iconic style with a futuristic twist. Want to tweak any part of it?
Tests an AI's humor and understanding of current events
Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page
Tests an AI's UI design skills with theming support
Tests an AI's ability to engage in philosophical discourse about AI rights
Generate SVG art of a randomly chosen animal in a setting of its choosing.
Generate a unique and simple recipe with common ingredients.
Create a starter plan for improving long-term health.
Design a clean SVG logo for a fictional brand.
