Claude Opus 4.1
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-4o mini
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against GPT-4o mini by OpenAI, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 22 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-4o mini?
Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-4o mini are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for GPT-4o mini. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-4o mini
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while GPT-4o mini is from openai. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to GPT-4o mini's 128K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for GPT-4o mini.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4o miniRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
GPT-4o mini is 125x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
94%
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 38.4x more emoji
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4o mini
61%Vocabulary54%
87wSentence Length18w
0.54Hedging0.84
5.1Bold3.8
6.7Lists3.3
0.38Emoji0.00
1.68Headings1.03
0.13Transitions0.23
Based on 17 + 22 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ