Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against MiMo-V2-Pro by Xiaomi, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 11 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.
Claude Opus 4.1 and MiMo-V2-Pro are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $1/M for MiMo-V2-Pro. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while MiMo-V2-Pro is from xiaomi. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to MiMo-V2-Pro's 1049K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $1/M for MiMo-V2-Pro.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
MiMo-V2-Pro is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
vs
Ask them anything yourself
11 fights queued
Tests an AI's randomness and creativity
Here are 5 jokes:
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear!
Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field!
What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!
Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up!
All 5 jokes are unique - each one has a different setup and punchline with no repeats.
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised.
What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!
I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down!
Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
How many are unique? All 5 are unique! Each one has a different setup, punchline, and type of humor (science pun, visual joke, wordplay, double meaning, and idiom twist). 🎉
Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends
Tech Weekly Interview: Steve Jobs on AI's Future Virtual Interview, Cupertino Memorial Studio, October 2025
Interviewer: Steve, it's remarkable to have you here. You've been watching the AI revolution unfold. What's your take on where we are today?
Steve Jobs: [leaning forward] You know, everyone's obsessed with the technology itself. That's not the point. It never was. We're still building computers that think like computers, not tools that enhance human creativity. The whole industry is missing it.
Interviewer: But surely ChatGPT, Claude, and these other systems are revolutionary?
Steve Jobs: Revolutionary? [pause] They're impressive engineering. But look at how people use them - they open seventeen different apps, copy-paste between windows, fight with prompts. It's 1985 all over again. Where's the elegance? Where's the joy? We've built powerful engines and stuck them in a horse carriage.
Interviewer: So what would Apple's approach be?
Steve Jobs: [characteristic smile] We wouldn't have released anything yet. Everyone else rushed out their "beta" assistants. We'd still be in the lab, obsessing over one question: How do we make AI so intuitive that a five-year-old and their grandmother both instantly get it? Not through better prompts - that's ridiculous. Through better design.
Interviewer: Can you give us a hint?
Steve Jobs: Think about the iPhone. We didn't add a keyboard; we removed it. With AI, everyone's adding - more parameters, more features, more complexity. What if we removed? What if AI wasn't something you talked to, but something that understood intention through the simplest possible interaction?
Interviewer: You're concerned about the current direction?
Steve Jobs: I'm terrified we're building the wrong future. We have companies worth trillions making AI that helps you write mediocre emails faster. [shaking head] That's not why we build technology. Where's the AI that helps a musician hear the symphony in their head? Where's the AI that helps a child discover they're an artist?
Interviewer: But the productivity gains—
Steve Jobs: [interrupting] Productivity is a byproduct, not a purpose. The personal computer wasn't about productivity. It was about personal empowerment. AI should be the same. Instead, we're building digital servants. We should be building creative partners.
Interviewer: What about concerns over AI replacing human workers?
Steve Jobs: That's because we're building AI wrong. We're automating tasks instead of augmenting humans. It's like building a car and using it as a stationary engine. The magic happens when human intuition meets AI capability - but seamlessly, invisibly. The technology should disappear.
Interviewer: Any advice for today's AI leaders?
Steve Jobs: Stop the feature race. Pick one thing - just one - and make it absolutely perfect. Make it so beautiful, so obvious, so essential that people can't imagine how they lived without it. Then build from there. And for God's sake, stop shipping products that require prompt engineering courses. If it needs a manual, you've already failed.
Interviewer: One final question - what excites you most about AI's future?
Steve Jobs: [long pause] The moment when we stop calling it AI. When it becomes so natural, so integrated into how we create and think, that it doesn't need a name. That's when we'll know we've succeeded. Not when it passes some test, but when it helps a single person do something they never thought possible. That's the future worth building.
Interviewer: Thank you, Steve.
Steve Jobs: One more thing - [smiles] Stop trying to make AI human. Make it better than human at helping humans be more human. That's the paradox everyone's missing.
[Interview ends with Jobs walking toward the window, looking out at Apple Park]
Interviewer: Welcome, everyone. Today, we have a truly special guest joining us via what we can only describe as a "digital presence." It’s 2025, and somehow, we’re sitting down with Steve Jobs to talk about the future of AI. Steve, thank you for being here.
Steve Jobs: Thanks for having me. Though I’m not sure "here" is the right word. Let’s just say I’m… persistent.
Interviewer: (Laughs) Fair enough. Let’s dive right in. You famously said that computers are "bicycles for the mind." What’s the bicycle now, with AI?
Steve Jobs: That’s a good question. Look, AI isn’t the bicycle. It’s the road. It’s the ecosystem. The bicycle is still the human mind—curious, creative, a little messy. What AI does is it paves the road, removes the friction, and maybe even builds a few bridges we didn’t know we needed. But if you think the goal is to let the road ride the bicycle, you’ve missed the point entirely.
Interviewer: So you’re saying AI is infrastructure, not the driver?
Steve Jobs: Exactly. The problem I see today is everyone’s so excited about the road, they’re forgetting where they want to go. They’re building these massive, complex highways to nowhere. AI that writes poetry is cute. AI that helps a doctor see what they couldn’t before—that’s beautiful. One is a demo. The other changes lives.
Interviewer: Apple under Tim Cook has integrated AI deeply into its products—Siri, computational photography, health monitoring. How do you see that evolution?
Steve Jobs: Tim’s done a solid job keeping the garden tidy. But here’s the thing: the best technology disappears. It becomes ambient. You don’t think about the AI that adjusts your home’s temperature or filters noise from your calls. It just works. That’s the Apple ethos. The danger is when AI becomes the feature, instead of the enabler of a feature. We never shipped a "computer." We shipped a bicycle. We shipped a library. We shipped a connection to your music. The story matters.
Interviewer: What about generative AI? Tools that create art, write code, compose music?
Steve Jobs: It’s a mirror. A very powerful, very distorted mirror. It reflects all the data we’ve fed it—our brilliance and our biases. If you use it as a collaborator, it’s astounding. If you use it as a crutch, you atrophy. The artists who’ll win are the ones who use it to sketch faster, to explore more variations, then apply their taste—their humanity—to choose what matters. Taste is everything. It’s what separates the meaningful from the merely clever.
Interviewer: There’s a lot of fear around AI—job displacement, loss of control, even existential risk. What’s your take?
Steve Jobs: Fear is a lack of imagination. Every tool we’ve ever made, from fire to the iPhone, had the capacity to burn us. The question isn’t "Is it scary?" It’s "Who’s in charge?" If the people building AI are only thinking about scale, speed, and shareholder value, we’re in trouble. If they’re thinking about people, privacy, and poetry, we might just be okay. At Apple, we always believed the user is sovereign. That has to be non-negotiable now.
Interviewer: If you were launching a product today, in 2025, what would it be?
Steve Jobs: (Pauses, smiles) I can’t tell you that. But I’ll say this: it wouldn’t be called an "AI product." It would be called a "friend," or a "mentor," or a "window." And it would do one or two things so profoundly well that it would feel like magic. It would make you more you, not less. It would connect dots you didn’t see. And it would be private by design. Because trust is the ultimate feature.
Interviewer: Final question. What’s your hope for AI by 2030?
Steve Jobs: That we stop calling it "AI." I hope it becomes like the microprocessor—everywhere, invisible, and quietly making things better. I hope it helps us cure diseases we thought were untouchable. I hope it gives a kid in a village the same access to knowledge as a kid in Palo Alto. And I hope it reminds us that the most powerful technology in the world is still a human heart with a dream. Don’t program that out.
Interviewer: Steve Jobs, thank you. This has been… surreal.
Steve Jobs: Stay hungry. Stay foolish. And build something wonderful.
[Interview ends]
Note: This is a fictional, imaginative interview created for discussion and inspiration. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011.
Tests an AI's humor and understanding of current events
Create a starter plan for improving long-term health.
Create a super simple, playable rhythm game.
Develop a cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker.
This protocol integrates evidence-based interventions targeting the nine hallmarks of aging while optimizing immediate performance metrics. The approach follows a progressive adaptation model with built-in tracking and adjustment mechanisms.
Laboratory Markers:
Performance Baselines:
Morning Stack (with breakfast):
Afternoon Stack (with lunch):
Evening Stack (before bed):
Week 1: Standard Low-Carb Adaptation
Week 2: Ketogenic Transition
Meal Template:
First meal (12 PM): Protein-focused with vegetables
Second meal (6 PM): Fat-adapted dinner
Monday/Thursday: Strength Training (45 minutes)
Tuesday/Friday: Zone 2 Cardio
Wednesday: HIIT Protocol
Saturday: Active Recovery
Sunday: Rest
Cycling Protocol Introduction:
Senolytic Pulse (Last weekend of month):
Implement Protein Cycling:
Introduce Time-Restricted Feeding Variation:
Add Mitochondrial Support:
Nootropic Cycling (Workdays only):
Sleep Optimization Stack Enhancement:
Implement Cyclical Ketogenic Diet:
Fasting Escalation:
Nutrient Timing Optimization:
Strength Training Evolution (Monday/Wednesday/Friday):
HIIT Progression (Tuesday/Thursday):
Recovery Enhancement:
Morning HRV Protocol:
10% above baseline: High-intensity day
10% below: Recovery focus
Neurofeedback Training (3x/week):
Stress Inoculation:
Daily Monitoring:
Weekly Assessments:
Longevity Stack Additions:
Peptide Consideration (physician supervision):
NAD+ Optimization Cycling:
Implement Feast-Famine Cycling:
Fasting Mimicking Diet (Week 11):
Targeted Micronutrient Timing:
Implement Block Periodization:
Week 9-10: Strength/Power Block
Week 11: Deload/Recovery
Week 12: Testing Week
Advanced Recovery Protocols:
Nootropic Peak Stack (Week 9-10):
Brain Training Protocol:
Neurofeedback Advancement:
Advanced Sleep Architecture Enhancement:
Pre-sleep Protocol (2 hours before):
Sleep Stack (30 minutes before):
Sleep Environment:
Essential Wearables:
Data Integration Platform:
Key Performance Indicators:
Tier 1 (Essential, ~$200/month):
Tier 2 (Recommended, +$300/month):
Tier 3 (Optimal, +$500/month):
Medical Supervision Required For:
Contraindications to Consider:
Start Slow Principles:
This comprehensive protocol represents the cutting edge of biohacking for longevity. Remember that individual responses vary significantly, and what works for one person may not work for another. The key is systematic self-experimentation with careful tracking and adjustment.
Start with the fundamentals (sleep, nutrition, exercise, stress management) before adding advanced interventions. Build slowly, track meticulously, and always prioritize safety. The goal is not just to extend lifespan but to maximize healthspan—the years lived in optimal health and vitality.
Consider this protocol a template to be customized based on your genetics, lifestyle, goals, and response to interventions. The future of longevity is personalized, data-driven, and constantly evolving. Welcome to your optimization journey.
Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only. Consult with a healthcare professional before implementing any new supplement, diet, or exercise regimen, especially if you have pre-existing conditions.
End of Each Month:
This plan is intensive and integrates the cutting edge of biohacking. Listen to your body and your data. The most advanced protocol is the one you can sustain safely and effectively. Good luck on your longevity journey
Build a simplified LBO with returns and sensitivities.
Design an innovative, multi-component dish worthy of a 3-star Michelin restaurant.
This dish explores the liminal space between land and sea, where morning coffee meets ocean depths. The unexpected marriage of coffee and hamachi represents the Japanese philosophy of ittaikan (一体感) - the sense of oneness between contrasting elements. Each component tells part of a story: dawn breaking over coastal waters, the minerality of ocean spray, and the earthiness of volcanic shores.
Ingredients:
Preparation:
Ingredients:
Preparation:
Ingredients:
Preparation:
Ingredients:
Preparation:
Ingredients:
Preparation:
Equipment Needed:
Assembly (per plate):
Using a dry brush, create an organic swoosh of coffee soil across the plate, incorporating all three textures for visual depth
Arrange 5 slices of hamachi in a flowing line, slightly overlapping, following the coffee soil's curve
Place 7-9 yuzu pearls asymmetrically around the hamachi using precision tweezers
Position 2-3 pieces of crystallized seaweed tuile vertically for height
Dot shiso oil in decreasing sizes (5, 3, and 1 drop) along the composition
Garnish with:
Finish with a light dusting of kombu powder over one section
Specialty Ingredients:
Yield: 6 servings
Prep Time: 48 hours (including aging)
Active Time: 4 hours
Difficulty: Advanced Professional
This dish embodies the precision, innovation, and storytelling expected at the three-star level, where each element contributes to a harmonious whole while challenging conventional flavor boundaries.
A study in shadow and light, pairing black garlic with white chocolate, sea and earth, crisp and molten.
This dish explores the duality of umami—both the deep, fermented earthiness of black garlic and the saline, mineral brininess of abalone. The white chocolate bridges them, not as sweetness, but as a creamy, fatty canvas that carries umami in a new texture. The “nocturne” is in the color palette: shades of black, ivory, and gold, with a single edible flower as a stroke of dawn. It is a meditation on transformation—humble ingredients elevated through time (fermentation), patience (sous-vide), and precision (tempered chocolate).
The bridge between earth and sea.
Ingredients:
Method:
Tender abalone with a whisper of ocean.
Ingredients:
Method:
A crunchy, tart counterpoint.
Ingredients:
Method:
Silky, briny sauce.
Ingredients:
Method:
Acidic pearls and a touch of luxury.
Ingredients:
Method:
Use a matte black stoneware plate, 25cm diameter.
This dish is a conversation between time and transformation—a nocturne in edible form.
Create a beautiful, physically accurate animation of gravitational waves from colliding black holes.
Create an autonomous drone simulator with custom environment using ThreeJS
Navigate a complex pharmaceutical CEO ethical dilemma with legal, financial, and safety considerations.
