Claude Opus 4.1vsQwen3 235B A22B
Claude Opus 4.1 has a larger context window than Qwen3 235B A22B (200K tokens vs 33K tokens).
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.1 | Qwen3 235B A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | — |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | — |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 33K tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | 235B (22B Active) |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.5% | 61.7% |
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.1
Qwen3 235B A22BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Claude Opus 4.1 takes Image Generation.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.1
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input
—
Output
—
Where to run it
3 hosts
Qwen3 235B A22B1 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
48%
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 4.0x more sentence length
Claude Opus 4.1
Qwen3 235B A22B
63%Vocabulary59%
64wSentence Length16w
0.72Hedging0.58
4.5Bold7.0
5.3Lists4.1
0.81Emoji0.33
1.42Headings0.88
0.16Transitions0.14
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05New provider
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507Cross-provider
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Cross-provider
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3BCross-provider
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Cross-provider