Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against Qwen3 235B A22B by Qwen, in 3 community votes, claude opus 4.1 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 33K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Claude Opus 4.1 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 3 blind community votes on Rival. Context windows: 200K vs 33K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while Qwen3 235B A22B is from qwen. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's 33K. In community voting, In 3 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 3 community votes, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Claude Opus 4.1 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 3+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Pick Claude Opus 4.1. In 3 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.1 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude Opus 4.1 particularly excels in Image Generation.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 53.9x more hedging
