Claude Opus 4.1vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 at $0.11/M vs $15/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.1 | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.1
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.1 has the edge: bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 takes Image Generation. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 125x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.1
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
136× cheaper
Output
$0.60
125× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 136× input, 125× output.
Where to run it
5 hosts, cheapest first
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25073 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
50%
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 4.2x more sentence length
Claude Opus 4.1
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
63%Vocabulary56%
64wSentence Length15w
0.72Hedging0.42
4.5Bold6.1
5.3Lists4.3
0.81Emoji0.99
1.42Headings0.70
0.16Transitions0.13
Based on 26 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Polaris AlphaNew provider
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Pony AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Quasar AlphaNew provider
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen Plus 0728Cross-provider