What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 Coder Next?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic while Qwen3 Coder Next is developed by Qwen. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3 Coder Next's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 Coder Next each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Opus 4.1 cost compared to Qwen3 Coder Next?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.2/M input tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next is $14.80/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 Coder Next on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 Coder Next across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Feb 2026

Claude Opus 4.1vsQwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 at $0.2/M vs $15/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 Coder Next compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	Claude Opus 4.1	Qwen3 Coder Next
Input price	$15/M tokens	$0.2/M tokens
Output price	$75/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	262K tokens
Parameters	Not disclosed	80B (3B active)
Weights	Closed	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Aug 2025	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	74.5%	70.6%