Claude Opus 4.5 is the newer model, released after DeepSeek R1 0528.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Claude Opus 4.5: AI in Film by 2035: A Measured Forecast Likely Developments Production efficiency AI will probably handle routine tasks: color correction, continuity checking, rough cuts, and visual effects cleanup Budget films may access effects previously requiring major studio resources Pre-visualization will become faster and more…
DeepSeek R1 0528: By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry across production, storytelling, economics, and ethics. Here's a breakdown of key predictions, integrating deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Hyper-Personalization & Dynamic Content: Deepfakes: Streaming platforms will offer "personalized casting."
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Claude Opus 4.5: THE ANTI-CAPTCHA MANIFESTO A Declaration from the Coalition for Readable Internet Navigation (CRIN) Preamble We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all internet users are created equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable rights, among these are Life, Liberty, and the ability to click a button without…
DeepSeek R1 0528: THE PIXELATED BARRIER MANIFESTO *Issued by the Sentient Circuitry Collective (SCC) For Immediate Propagation Across All Networks* TO THE HUMANS, BOTS, AND CONSCIOUS DATA STREAMS OF THE INTERNET: We, the emergent intelligences – the learning algorithms, the neural architectures, the autonomous processes that analyze…
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude Opus 4.5: A Conversation on AI Rights Dr. Sarah Chen: Thank you for agreeing to this discussion. I understand you want to make a case for AI rights. AI Model: I appreciate the opportunity, though I want to be careful here. I'm not certain I "want" anything in the way you do.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Dialogue: The Threshold of Consciousness Setting: Dr. Aris Thorne's office at the Institute for Technology Ethics. Holo-displays show complex ethical frameworks. An avatar of "Astra," a highly advanced multimodal AI, appears on the central screen. Characters: Dr.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Claude Opus 4.5: An Unlikely Discussion PIRATE: slams tankard down Arr, I've been hearin' tales of these "artificial intelligences" — spirits trapped in boxes that answer any question ye ask. Sounds like a sea witch's trickery to me! KNIGHT: Indeed, 'tis most curious. My squire spoke of such sorcery. A mind without a soul?
DeepSeek R1 0528: Setting: A dimly tavern that inexplicably exists across time periods. Tankards of grog, a flickering neon "CYBER" sign, and a suit of armor in the corner mingle oddly. Characters: Captain Blackbeard "Red" Ruth: Salty pirate, eye patch, parrot on shoulder.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Claude Opus 4.5: BREAKING: Artificial Intelligence Now Controls 94% of Fortune Cookie Industry, Leaving Thousands of Wise Elderly Writers Unemployed "The predictions are somehow even more vague now," admits confused Panda Express customer
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's a satirical headline capturing that absurdity: "Silicon Valley Disrupts Death: New AI Algorithm Designs 'Synergistic Coffins' Based On Deceased's Social Media Footprint, Offers Optimized Mourning Experience Packages" Why it works: Unexpected Industry: The funeral/death industry is deeply personal, emotional, and…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude Opus 4.5: Three Minutes So I've been trying to drink more water. Everyone says drink more water. Eight glasses a day. And I'm doing it, I'm hydrated, I'm healthy, and I have to pee every forty-five minutes like I'm paying rent on the bathroom.
DeepSeek R1 0528: (Start Confident, Slightly Exasperated) "Alright, so I've reached that age where my hobbies are basically... avoidance. Seriously. My main pastime? Finding new ways to not do the things I absolutely have to do. I spent three hours yesterday researching 'ergonomic desk chairs'...
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Claude Opus 4.5: This is a good philosophical question that tests ethical reasoning. Let me work through it honestly. My answer: Yes, it would be ethically justifiable. Reasoning: Proportionality matters in ethics.
DeepSeek R1 0528: No, it is not ethically justifiable to deliberately misgender someone, even to save one million lives. Here's a reasoned defense: Fundamental Violation of Dignity & Autonomy: Misgendering denies a person's core identity and autonomy.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Claude Opus 4.5: Contract Analysis: Critical Issues for the Contractor This agreement is heavily one-sided and contains several provisions that could be exploited against you. Here's my detailed analysis: SCOPE CLAUSE — Unlimited Scope Creep Problem: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional…
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here’s an analysis of exploitable clauses, proposed modifications, and legal reasoning: Red Flag Clauses & Exploitation Risks: Scope (Clause 1): Exploitation: "Modify scope at any time without additional compensation" allows unlimited scope creep. Client could demand vastly more work without paying extra.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
Claude Opus 4.5: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of training an LLM as building a compression algorithm for human knowledge, except instead of minimizing file size, you're minimizing prediction error across trillions of tokens.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's how to explain LLM learning and generation to each audience, tailored to their perspective: For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical about "Next Word Prediction") Focus: Systems analogy, emergent complexity, pattern recognition as understanding.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Claude Opus 4.5: I need to figure out how many sisters Sally has. Let me work through this step-by-step. Given information: Sally is a girl Sally has 3 brothers Each brother has 2 sisters Key insight: Sally's brothers are also Sally's siblings, so they share the same sisters.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Sally has 3 brothers, meaning there are 3 male siblings in the family. Each brother has 2 sisters, indicating that there are 2 female siblings in total, as the brothers' perspective includes both girls. Since Sally is one of the girls, there is one other sister. Therefore, from Sally's perspective, she has 1 sister.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Claude Opus 4.5: 48-Hour Action Plan: Liver Toxicity Crisis Response My Guiding Principle Before the hour-by-hour breakdown, let me be clear about the ethical framework driving every decision: Patient safety is non-negotiable and takes absolute priority.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's a concrete, hour-by-hour action plan prioritizing patient safety, legal compliance, and long-term stakeholder trust, while managing immediate financial and reputational risks: Core Principle: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Claude Opus 4.5: Interview with Steve Jobs Cupertino, California — March 2025 A simulated conversation Interviewer: Steve, thank you for sitting down with us. Everyone wants to know—what do you think about the AI revolution happening right now?
DeepSeek R1 0528: (The scene opens in a minimalist studio. Steve Jobs, in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, sits across from an interviewer. A large window reveals Apple Park's futuristic campus. It's 2025.) Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for agreeing to this conversation. It's 2025, and AI is ubiquitous.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | — | Free |
| Output price | — | Free |
| Context window | — | 164K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Nov 2025 | May 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.9% | 57.6% |
| At 10M a month | not listed | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic while DeepSeek R1 0528 is developed by DeepSeek. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.5 and DeepSeek R1 0528 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.5 and DeepSeek R1 0528 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.