Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Compare Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI against Qwen3 Coder Next by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 Coder Next are both competitive models. Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.2/M for Qwen3 Coder Next. Context windows: 1000K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 Coder Next

Llama 4 Maverick is made by meta while Qwen3 Coder Next is from qwen. Llama 4 Maverick has a 1000K token context window compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's 262K. On pricing, Llama 4 Maverick costs $1.5/M input tokens vs $0.2/M for Qwen3 Coder Next.

Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder NextRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Qwen3 Coder Next uses 85.8x more emoji

Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Coder Next
42%Vocabulary58%
24wSentence Length19w
0.76Hedging0.29
3.7Bold6.3
6.3Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.86
0.74Headings0.92
0.11Transitions0.07
Based on 12 + 21 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Llama 4 MaverickQwen3 Coder Next

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions