Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Compare Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic against Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 500K, tested across 20 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7
Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 50x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input
$0.25
20× cheaper
Output
$0.50
50× cheaper
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper on both — 20× input, 50× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
32%
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 86.2x more emoji
Claude Opus 4.7
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
64%Vocabulary54%
20wSentence Length15w
0.51Hedging0.64
4.6Bold3.8
3.8Lists2.4
0.86Emoji0.00
1.60Headings0.03
0.03Transitions0.30
Based on 27 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
