Claude Opus 4.7vsQwen3.5 122B A10B
Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 at $0.4/M vs $5/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Qwen3.5 122B A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $25/M tokens | $3.2/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Feb 2026 |
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen3.5 122B A10BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs 7.8x less per token.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input
$0.40
13× cheaper
Output
$3.20
7.8× cheaper
Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper on both: 13× input, 7.8× output.
Where to run it
9 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
34%
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 8.3x more emoji
Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
64%Vocabulary49%
20wSentence Length15w
0.51Hedging0.29
4.6Bold6.2
3.8Lists4.8
0.86Emoji0.10
1.60Headings0.88
0.03Transitions0.20
Based on 27 + 24 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5New provider
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemma 3n 2BNew provider
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemma 3n 4BNew provider
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemma 4 26B A4BNew provider
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemma 4 31BNew provider