Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
Compare Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 45 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?
Claude Opus 4.7 and Google: Gemma 4 31B are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 1000K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.7 and Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude Opus 4.7 is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1000K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 36× input, 63× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Google: Gemma 4 31B is 63x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 4.8x more transitions
