Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Compare Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B by Qwen, in 3 community votes, claude opus 4.7 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7Winner
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3BRunner-up
Pick Claude Opus 4.7. In 3 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 26x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input
$0.16
31× cheaper
Output
$0.97
26× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper on both — 31× input, 26× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
79%
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 2.1x more headings
Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
64%Vocabulary59%
20wSentence Length15w
0.51Hedging0.31
4.6Bold4.9
3.8Lists2.7
0.86Emoji1.60
1.60Headings0.75
0.03Transitions0.05
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
