Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 4.8vsGrok 4.7
Updated Sep 2026

Claude Opus 4.8vsGrok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 at $1.6/M vs $5/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.7 compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.7
Input price$5/M tokens$1.6/M tokens
Output price$25/M tokens$4.8/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens500K tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Claude Opus 4.8997 words
For the Skeptical Software Engineer You're right to be skeptical that "predict the next word" sounds trivial—but think about what's actually required to predict well. Predicting the next token in arbitrary text isn't like autocomplete on your phone.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude Opus 4.81,355 words
Architecture Review: Collaborative Document Editor This design has several critical flaws that will manifest as data loss, poor UX, and scaling walls. Let me break them down by category.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Claude Opus 4.8196 words
Cinnamon Sugar Pull-Apart Bites A warm, gooey treat that tastes like a cinnamon roll but comes together in minutes! Ingredients (7 total) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tablespoon baking powder 1 teaspoon salt ¾ cup milk 4 tablespoons butter (melted, divided) ½ cup sugar 2 teaspoons ground cinnamon Instructions Preheat…
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Claude Opus 4.8316 words
1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan A realistic, beginner-friendly approach focusing on three pillars: Movement, Nutrition, and Sleep. The goal is to build sustainable habits, not perfection. 🏃 Pillar 1: Movement Goal: Make daily activity automatic.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Claude Opus 4.8676 words
Analysis: 3 Weakest Claims in MindMeld AI's Pitch Weak Claim #1: The Core Technology Claim (Slide 1 & 3) The claim: "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type *before you think it*" + "94% accuracy" via a non-invasive EEG headband.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Grok 4.7 costs 5.2x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.8
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
3.1× cheaper
Output
$4.80
5.2× cheaper

Grok 4.7 is cheaper on both: 3.1× input, 5.2× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts

Claude Opus 4.84 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·98.8% upAzure AI Foundry$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·93.8% upAnthropic$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$5.00 in·$25.00 out·1M·99.9% up
Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·99.1% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude Opus 4.8 is developed by Anthropic while Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI. Claude Opus 4.8 has a 1.0M token context window vs Grok 4.7's 500K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.7 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5/M input tokens and Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens. Grok 4.7 is $3.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.7 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 4.8 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.8 logoHy3 logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.8 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 4.8 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 4.8 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same lab
Claude Opus 4.8 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Fable 5.1Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Same size
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Same size
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3 Coder logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3 CoderNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3 Coder Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3 Coder FlashNew provider

Model pages

Claude Opus 4.8 logo
Claude Opus 4.858 outputs, specs and price
Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed