Claude Opus 4.8vsQwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 at $0.2/M vs $5/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.8 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $25/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2026 | Feb 2026 |
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen3 Coder NextRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Coder Next costs 17x less per token.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.8
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Qwen3 Coder Next
Input
$0.20
25× cheaper
Output
$1.50
17× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper on both: 25× input, 17× output.
Where to run it
8 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
65%
Claude Opus 4.8 uses 1.7x more hedging
Claude Opus 4.8
Qwen3 Coder Next
60%Vocabulary58%
19wSentence Length19w
0.46Hedging0.27
4.7Bold6.4
3.2Lists4.4
0.78Emoji0.84
1.15Headings0.98
0.04Transitions0.06
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2-FlashNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2-OmniNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiMo-V2-ProNew provider