Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against Qwen Plus 0728 by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude Opus 4 and Qwen Plus 0728 are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while Qwen Plus 0728 is from qwen. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen Plus 0728's 1000K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728.
Qwen Plus 0728 is cheaper on both — 38× input, 63× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen Plus 0728 is 63x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Qwen Plus 0728 uses 6.0x more emoji
Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against Qwen Plus 0728 by Qwen, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Claude Opus 4 and Qwen Plus 0728 are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728. Context windows: 200K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while Qwen Plus 0728 is from qwen. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to Qwen Plus 0728's 1000K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728.
Qwen Plus 0728 is cheaper on both — 38× input, 63× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen Plus 0728 is 63x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Qwen Plus 0728 uses 6.0x more emoji