Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, in 8 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b 2507 wins 63% of head-to-head duels, tested across 36 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 63% of 8 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is from qwen. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. In community voting, In 8 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 wins 63% of head-to-head duels.
In 8 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 wins 63% of head-to-head duels. Claude Opus 4 leads in Image Generation, while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 leads in Reasoning. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 8+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. In 8 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 wins 63% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Claude Opus 4 for Image Generation. Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 for Reasoning. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 88235x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 4.0x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
