Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, in 8 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b 2507 wins 63% of head-to-head duels, tested across 36 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 63% of 8 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is from qwen. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.00015/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. In community voting, In 8 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 wins 63% of head-to-head duels.
In 8 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 wins 63% of head-to-head duels. Claude Opus 4 leads in Image Generation, while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 leads in Reasoning. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 8+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both — 100000× input, 88235× output
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. In 8 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 wins 63% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Claude Opus 4 for Image Generation. Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 for Reasoning. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 88235x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 4.0x more emoji
