Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, in 8 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b 2507 wins 63% of head-to-head duels, tested across 36 shared challenges.
Image Generation: Claude Opus 4 wins 67% of votes
Web Design: Claude Opus 4 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 are tied
Reasoning: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507Winner
Claude Opus 4Runner-up
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507. In 8 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 wins 63% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Claude Opus 4 for Image Generation. Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 for Reasoning. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 88235x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input
$0.000
100000× cheaper
Output
$0.001
88235× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both — 100000× input, 88235× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
71%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 4.0x more emoji
Claude Opus 4
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
64%Vocabulary57%
62wSentence Length18w
0.52Hedging0.40
4.4Bold5.9
9.1Lists4.8
0.11Emoji0.45
1.87Headings1.07
0.27Transitions0.11
Based on 16 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
