MiniMax M1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare MiniMax M1 by MiniMax against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, tested across 36 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiniMax M1
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 1941x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M1
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.65
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input
$0.000
2000× cheaper
Output
$0.001
1941× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both — 2000× input, 1941× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
86%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 4.3x more emoji
MiniMax M1
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
53%Vocabulary57%
17wSentence Length18w
0.51Hedging0.40
7.4Bold5.9
6.2Lists4.8
0.10Emoji0.45
0.86Headings1.07
0.03Transitions0.11
Based on 14 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
